Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgtt02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:50:11 +0100
Chris Malcolm <cam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If eyes are as bad at colour matching as you say then why bother using
hardware to remove errors so small we couldn't possibly see them?
Our eyes are quite good when comparing side by side. Just
hold up a print next to your monitor and see if you cannot
see differences.
Contrariwise, if eyes are good enough to see the benefits of using
good colour matching hardware, then it should also be possible to
develop methods of using eyes to achieve the same accuracy.
No problem. You will need a stable, consistent source of light
for every colouring and shade to compare against --- a whole
bunch of visual tuning forks, so to say.
My guess is you will find it a couple thousand times more expensive
than current calibration hardware, not to mention very much slower
and quite eye straining for the same quality.
-Wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- References:
- Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: Mark2149@xxxxxxx
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: David Kilpatrick
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: nospam
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: David Kilpatrick
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: nospam
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: David Kilpatrick
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: nospam
- Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- From: Chris Malcolm
- Calibration software for an iMAC
- Prev by Date: Re: Ebay now awash in cheap 85mm f1.4 lenses...
- Next by Date: Re: What is Islam?
- Previous by thread: Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- Next by thread: Re: Calibration software for an iMAC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|