Re: Printers...

In article <gak164$nap$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Me <user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:

What printer are you using for photography?

Pros/cons of it?

Plans to upgrade, change approach, etc.

Thanks,
Alan

PS: I'm esp. interested in small pro printers such as the Epson 3800 and
Canon iPF5100, but all comments are very welcome.

I'm using an R1800 (13" carriage width). I bought it 3 years ago. It
took about a year of effort to really nail /my/ workflow so that I can
get a great result first time.
I use it to print mainly on matte (true matte) and semi-gloss papers.
For matte papers, the later "K3" (ie for 3800) inksets are better (R1800
gamut on deep saturated greens is more limited) For pearl (or gloss)
finish papers, there's very little difference. For monochorome,
printers with the multi-shade black inks should be better, but OTOH, I
can churn out better monochrome than many I've seen displayed printed
with Epson K3 by pros who apparently either don't know what they're
doing - or have strange taste or are colourblind etc.
An advantage that Epson /might/ have over Canon is that the Piezo
print-heads do not age, and each printer is factory colormetrically
calibrated. This applies to R1800 - not limited to "pro" (production
models) as reported by non-experts like Luminous Landscape. Thermal
heads do age (due to cycling of heating elements) and AFAIK, Canon does
not self-calibrate. HP's pro level thermal printers do self calibrate.
(in fact the high end models can also produce custom profiles using
inbuilt colorimeter)

Despite much supposedly good advice that "epson printers clog all the
time", in 3 years use, sometimes with extended periods of complete
non-use, my R1800 has never clogged and never missed a beat. I have
still not had to run a "cleaning cycle". The only extra reason for my
"good luck" may be that I periodically inspect the seals around the
printhead station to make sure that there is no ink build-up or paper
shards, and vacuum the interior to remove dust etc.

Print cost is much less for large prints than any local pro lab, plus I
can print on matte papers which are better IMO for framing. Conversely,
print cost for small prints is much higher than local discount labs, let
alone the time and hassle to print (OTOH the ability to be able to print
off small photographs immediately is sometimes priceless).

My printer as well, my next step in the work flow cycle is to buy a
color profiler. It should end the need for test prints.

--
Reality is a picture perfected and never looking back.
.

Relevant Pages

  • LaserWriter Pro repair questions
    ... I have both a LaserWriter Pro 600 and a 630. ... classic accordion on paper exit problem of printers this age. ... the left and the two lights to the right that further indicate a fuser ...
    (comp.sys.mac.printing)
  • Re: Protecting inkjet prints
    ... > Anyone had success with spray coatings to keep inkjet prints from fading? ... a gelatin surfaced paper and Epson Doubleweight Matte. ... Many papers don't handle dye inks well. ... Epson Colorlife (Epson printers only) and HP papers designed to ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Printers...
    ... For monochorome, printers with the multi-shade black inks should be better, but OTOH, I can churn out better monochrome than many I've seen displayed printed with Epson K3 by pros who apparently either don't know what they're doing - or have strange taste or are colourblind etc. ... An advantage that Epson /might/ have over Canon is that the Piezo print-heads do not age, and each printer is factory colormetrically ... HP's pro level thermal printers do self calibrate. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: spoolsv.exe memory leak
    ... Are these 21 shared printers on Pro or is the Pro machine connecting to a ... >> Alan Morris ... >> Search the Microsoft Knowledge Base here: ... >> printers and this is the only pc in our network having this problem. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.printing)
  • Re: Empty Epson carts still contain ink!!
    ... Epson printers are the choise of millions of pro's...Canon is not. ... The Epson 3800 is far superior to any Canon printer. ... This starts with the Pro 3800 printer. ...
    (comp.periphs.printers)