Re: cameras for Windows 95
- From: "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:14:04 +0100
"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6ZidnTrVAY4fPznVnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dystopianbooks@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can anyone suggest a digital camera that works with Windows 95? I
don't really want to upgrade the operating system?
A camera that a person could actually find somewhere, and get
inexpensively, new or used, would be preferable obviously.
Or, do the system requirements matter that much? I mean, if it says
Windows 98 minimum, is there a chance it would work with 95?
Others point out the Win95/USB issue.
I don't see the problem in upgrading to 98. It's the first reasonably
stable Windblows.
Only the S2 variant, still it was better than Windows ME which was about as
stable as a drunk on a unicycle.
You could probably buy a used Win98 machine (with the OS still loaded) and
use that as a bridge from camera to the Win95 machine.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.
.
- References:
- cameras for Windows 95
- From: dystopianbooks
- Re: cameras for Windows 95
- From: Alan Browne
- cameras for Windows 95
- Prev by Date: Re: Nikon D50 Focus Question
- Next by Date: Re: catalog NEF RAW files - only
- Previous by thread: Re: cameras for Windows 95
- Next by thread: Re: cameras for Windows 95
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading