Re: dumb question
- From: Me <user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:03:44 +1200
fred@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:03:08 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" <none@xxxxxxx> wrote:WRT the OP's question re print size, then:
Andrew Koenig added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ...
"P§³" <xvzex3qtgix@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uktkk.554$Ht4.171@xxxxxxxxxxxDPI is an incorrect unit designation; DPI is most commonly used for scanning where the hardware scans X dots per linear inch of material, where each dot turns into a pixel. In digital printing or processing, everything is already in pixels and is re-
I've been out of photography for many years so this digitalHow sharp do you want the print to be?
stuff is new to me so please forgive the dumb question. I'm
confused about the maximum image size one can get out of a
camera like the Nikon d700. What's the largest quality PRINT
one can make with this beast.
The basic image size is 2832 x 4256 pixels, which is 9.4 x 14
inches at 300 dots/inch or 14x21 inches at 200 dots/inch. For
bigger prints than that, you would probably want to use some
kind of dithering/upscaling tool such as Genuine Fractals.
converted to a spot on the paper, hence the proper units are PPI or Pixels Per Inch.
Wow are YOU wrong!!!
Pixels are reserved for MONITOR DISPLAYS!
Printers are ALLWAYS rated dots per inch! My Dad agrees, and he's been a
printer for 40 years... look up halftone mask...
DPI of inkjet printers (the number on the sales brochure/box) gives a totally unreasonable figure, but my "4800x2400 dpi" printer will resolve about 400 lines per inch horizontally and about 200 lines per inch vertically of dithered half-tones. So, it's potentially around about 600dpi (about double what most commercial wet-process prints are) depending what you measure and how.
So, unless printing at a very small size, while DPI may be a "standard", it's irrelevant when at the size of print ("largest?") the limiting factor is pixels, not printer resolution, unless you're using something very old for printing.
Anyway, IMO the most critical factor in "how many megapixels is enough" (apart from the obvious ones like viewing distance) is composition. Something drawing the viewer in (landscape) then 300 ppi is desirable, but portrait/macro/nature etc, it doesn't really matter very much at all. I've produced (IMO) great prints from 6mp at 19"x13" where resolution wasn't an obvious limiting factor, but others where above 12x8" approx, 6mp really starts to fall apart.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dumb question
- From: Colin.D
- Re: dumb question
- References:
- dumb question
- From: P§³
- Re: dumb question
- From: Andrew Koenig
- Re: dumb question
- From: HEMI-Powered
- Re: dumb question
- From: fred
- dumb question
- Prev by Date: Re: B&H has the Nikon D700 in stock
- Next by Date: Re: D700 sample photos up to 25,600 ISO
- Previous by thread: Re: dumb question
- Next by thread: Re: dumb question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading