Re: A simple question...


"Paul Furman" <paul-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FGKhk.7162$vn7.6864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Neil Harrington wrote:

You've surely seen Dorothea Lange's "Migrant Mother." If you've ever
seen a large print of that you've immediately noticed that the focus
is wrong -- Lange was using a large-format camera, depth of field was
extremely shallow and the plane of best focus was not on the
subject's eyes where it should have been, not even close. The texture
of part of her clothes is tack sharp but her eyes are not sharp at
all. (On web images this is harder to see. I used to have a big
Graphic-Graflex book with this and some other famous photos in very
high quality full-page prints, and the focusing error really jumps
out at you.) But it's still a great shot.

http://memory.loc.gov/pnp/fsa/8b29000/8b29500/8b29516v.jpg

Interesting observation although it's possible the focus works better as
shot, emphasizing the children & ragged clothes, where the woman's face is
already plenty strong as a feature. Probably a stretch but maybe...

If you saw the large high-quality reproduction in my old Graphic-Graflex
book, I'm sure you'd agree that the focus was a mistake. Actually, for that
shot, I suppose that using such a large-format camera in the first place was
a mistake on account of its very shallow depth of field at that distance.
But I guess that was the camera she *had*, so that was that.

I assume she was shooting that big beast hand-held, since she mentioned
making four or five shots as she moved closer to the subject. With the slow
films of that time she must have been shooting wide open or nearly so, in
order to use the shutter speeds to get the sharpness she got. On the larger
reproduction I recall parts of it were beautifully sharp -- but they were
the wrong parts, in a very shallow plane, and the eyes were not sharp at
all. Of course, those old Graflexes I'm sure just had a plain ground glass
with no focusing aids. I suspect those Graflexes were more complicated to
operate, too, than our familiar 35mm SLRs.

Neil


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Digital VS Emulsion
    ... You may not be _able_ to get sharp focus over ... DOF to get the best range of sharp focus for the shot. ... in the viewfinder when the near and far points of the subject were ... by "1/3 the distance from the front of the subject" just gets you a blur. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Digital VS Emulsion
    ... You may not be _able_ to get sharp focus over ... DOF to get the best range of sharp focus for the shot. ... in the viewfinder when the near and far points of the subject were ... "1/3 the distance from the front of the subject" just gets you a blur. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: A simple question...
    ... extremely shallow and the plane of best focus was not on the ... of part of her clothes is tack sharp but her eyes are not sharp at ... But it's still a great shot. ... I suppose that using such a large-format camera in the first ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: FEELIN FUZZY WITH THE 40D!
    ... Sharp and gritty:http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96701259 ... A great shot of both feathered friends. ... The catch light in the eye brings life to ... the viewer that the duckling is next to water. ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)