Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- From: "David J Taylor" <david-taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:45:21 GMT
OldBoy wrote:
[]
In-lens IS doesn't have to be that heavy:
705g Canon EF 70-200 f/4 L non-IS
760g Canon EF 70-200 f/4 L IS
or for Nikon....
255g Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6
335g Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR
Less than 3oz more.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- From: OldBoy
- Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- References:
- In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- From: 3Putt from CoastalSouth Carolina
- Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- From: flaming-o
- Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- From: OldBoy
- In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- Prev by Date: Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- Next by Date: Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- Previous by thread: Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- Next by thread: Re: In-camera stabilization or in-lens?
- Index(es):
