Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: Doug Jewell <ask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:52:57 +1000
Doug Jewell wrote:
John Adams wrote:Actually, I wouldn't put a lot of faith in that site. Just looked at a few other cameras, and it appears they don't make much effort to ensure the cameras are shooting in consistent settings. I picked a few cameras at random, and they all had the main scene rendered at different sizes, and the main scene seems to change quite a bit too.SMS 斯蒂文• 夏 wrote:Agree that the Olympus looks better in the first shot - but the difference could be the lens, or could be differences in the level of sharpening.
Stay away from the Olympus digital SLRs because they use a smaller sensor and are noisier.
Then why do the Olympus E510 examples look better than the Nikon D40X in side by side comparison?
http://www.digitalversus.com/duels.php?ty=1&ma1=32&mo1=338&p1=2177&ma2=31&mo2=336&p2=2175&ph=2
Now go to the drop down list and choose "Barbie, detail without flash". The Nikon is at ISO 3200, the Olympus is only at ISO 800. Despite the ISO on the Nikon being 4x the Olympus, they are about the same as far as noise. The Nikon colouring looks better too.
If they can't maintain consistency in the scene, how are we to know if they are using comparable camera settings? Other than the barbie without flash, they don't say what ISO, what white balance setting, what lens, what aperture, what shutter speed etc, they have taken the photo with.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: John Adams
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: Chris Savage
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- References:
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: SMS 斯蒂文• 夏
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: John Adams
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- From: Doug Jewell
- Re: $230 12MP camera?
- Prev by Date: Re: $230 12MP camera?
- Next by Date: Re: Dismal shutter lag versus film cameras
- Previous by thread: Re: $230 12MP camera?
- Next by thread: Re: $230 12MP camera?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|