Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- From: Paul J Gans <gans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:26:47 +0000 (UTC)
just bob <kilbyfan@aoldotcom> wrote:
"Pete Stavrakoglou" <ntotrr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:SEvVi.81$So6.71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scanned PDF here:
http://www.fjphotography.com/pdf/EOS1DMARKIII.pdf
Seriously (and this is not a "dig" at Canon), if Canon was being the
responsible company they are indicating, they would accept faulty units
for exchange or refund. $ 5,000.00 for a faulty camera and they won't
accept any for exchange?
Agreed. The Resellers get a refund but not the consumers. Doesn't exactly
make ya feel good, does it?
You don't know that the offical dealers get a refund. They may
not. They may just get the cameras back with a sticker saying
"Release 2".
And that's what the owners are going to get too. Yes, they will
be without their cameras for a while, but life's like that sometimes.
--
--- Paul J. Gans
.
- References:
- 1dIII withdrawn
- From: frederick
- Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- From: Pete Stavrakoglou
- Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- From: just bob
- 1dIII withdrawn
- Prev by Date: Re: So long
- Next by Date: Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- Previous by thread: Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- Next by thread: Re: 1dIII withdrawn
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
