Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- From: Red_Baron <roko0o@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:18:54 -0700
On 7 list, 02:11, Red_Baron <rok...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
cut
Maybee I wasn't clear enough. I'm not buying anything. I have to write
a comparison for one subject at the University. What do I want to
compare? Have no idea, I guess everything. Actually the only thing I'm
not interested is which af solution is better, rather the pros and
cons of both. Thank you for the information, and especially for the
keywords! I'll make some googling and will ask if I have any more
questions.
@wolfgang
Sorry for using your famous history person's nickname for an alias.
Hope you have no hard feelings about it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- From: frederick
- Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- References:
- canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- From: Red_Baron
- canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping John Bean & David Taylor: Samsung 24" LCD monitor clarified
- Next by Date: Sony takes a solid 3rd place, with ONE DSLR
- Previous by thread: Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- Next by thread: Re: canon-nikon AF technology- the difference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|