Re: The end of truly high-end lenses?
- From: Michael Benveniste <mhb-offer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:23:38 -0400
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:27:23 -0400, "Frank Arthur" <Art@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Stranger yet, did you ever know anyone who bought a fixed focal length
lens and paid $2000-4000 for it?
I assume you mean in the 50-100mm range. If so, the answer is no, since
both the people I know with 50mm Noctilux's paid more than $4000 for
them and I don't know anyone personally who bought a Canon 50mm f/1.0L.
If you are willing to stretch the range a bit, I've used a 105mm f/4.5
UV-Micro-Nikkor, for which the owner paid around $3200. (CoastalOpt
sells a clone for about $4500).
--
Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.
.
- References:
- The end of truly high-end lenses?
- From: RichA
- Re: The end of truly high-end lenses?
- From: Robert Coe
- Re: The end of truly high-end lenses?
- From: Frank Arthur
- The end of truly high-end lenses?
- Prev by Date: Re: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- Next by Date: Re: Canon lens numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: The end of truly high-end lenses?
- Next by thread: Nikon D300 heavy NR??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
