Re: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- From: Pboud <pboud_01NOSPAMAT@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:13:50 GMT
RichA wrote:
Hey retards who fall for Nikon's "nano-coatings" or Pentax's, exactly2.3, maybe 2.5 out of 10 for the use of Titanium...
how "large" do you think coating particles were before nanotechnology
became the "titanium" of today? This doesn't mean whatever coating
method they use is B.S, only that ALL coating methods operate at the
nano-scale, either molecular or even atomic level. But marketing
being what it is means the overuse of the word, just like how every
frigging product had (the word, anyway) "titanium" in it over the last
decade.
Up your game a bit and we might find these trolls interesting..
:)
P.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- From: RichA
- Re: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- References:
- Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- From: RichA
- Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- Prev by Date: Re: Bottom 20-percent D70s image dark
- Next by Date: Re: Pentax K10D
- Previous by thread: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- Next by thread: Re: Nano-scam B.S. coming to camera companies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|