Re: Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- From: "Gino" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 22:15:31 +0100
On a Canon 1.6 cropped body:
24mm
50mm
"Peter Amey" <pnanews@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5hk3srF3iqjauU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In my (many) years of 35mm film photography, prime lense selection always seemed raher simple:
50mm gave a perspective that seemed natural to the human eye and could be considered "standard"; 35mm was moderately wide angle; 28mm rather wide angle and 80mm good for reducing depth of field in portraits.
Now that I have been seduced to the EOS400 world, with its accompanying 1.6 focal length multiplier, it all seem rather more awkward.
In an attempt to get a "standard" lens I have bought an EF 28mm f2.8. This works out as quite visibly more wide angle than a 50mm on a film camera. I did try an EF 35mm but its equivalent 56mm was markedly narrower in field of view than a 50mm on a film camera.
The only easy one was the 50mm which gives me the 80mm portrait lens I am used to.
So do I just have to get used to this or will some "standard" small sensor lenses eventually appear? Or is this why there are so many zooms about?
Peter
--
www.amey.org.uk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- From: Robert Coe
- Re: Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- References:
- Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- From: Peter Amey
- Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- Prev by Date: Re: Image stabilization - which works better, sensor or lens shift?
- Next by Date: Re: Image stabilization - which works better, sensor or lens shift?
- Previous by thread: Re: Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- Next by thread: Re: Prime lenses for x1.6 focal length cameras
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading