Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: newsmb@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:12:24 -0700
On Jun 8, 6:22 pm, Wolfgang Weisselberg <ozcvgt...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/evaluation-nikon-d200/index.html
That means:
ISO 100 200 400 800 1600
RN in DN 1.25 2.03 3.85 7.4 14.8
Ughh.
Serves me right for feeding the trolls.
But while we're here, let's get real. You have absolutely NO IDEA
whatsoever what any of this really means, do you? Not a clue.
Try reading this:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/noise.htm
Basically there's lies, damn lies and noise measurements.
I am out of here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- References:
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: newsmb
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: newsmb
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: newsmb
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- From: Wolfgang Weisselberg
- Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- Prev by Date: Re: D2Xs versus D200 etc.
- Next by Date: Nikon D200 remotes?
- Previous by thread: Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- Next by thread: Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|