Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: John Sheehy <JPS@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 03:28:36 GMT
"Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in
news:1E37i.396422$g24.286295@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
That's certainly a posible contributor. The 100-400 IS L comes to
mind, with its push-pull design, though I used that lens on my D30 for
several years and never had a dust problem.
The air exchanges mostly through the lens itself and the outside world.
Dust accumulates in the lens, but I haven't seen any evidence that it pumps
air into the body to any degree. How much air would go through the body,
if it could escape through some other means?
I always have a 1.4x TC on my cameras with the 100-400, and the 20D and my
new 30D both collect garbage on the sensor very quickly - but it seems that
most of this garbage is generated by the camera itself, IME.
The 400D is the first Canon DSLR designed not to grind itself.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@xxxxxxx>
<<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><.
- References:
- Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: RichA
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: Tom Ross
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: Pete D
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: RichA
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: MarkČ
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: RichA
- Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- From: MarkČ
- Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- Prev by Date: Re: Nikon D80/200 - Canon 30d
- Next by Date: Re: Manfrotto/Bogen = near junk
- Previous by thread: Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- Next by thread: Re: Sickening amount of dust in 5D image
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|