Re: Nikon D40 vs D40x ISO newbie question

C J Campbell wrote:
http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/digital.sensor.performance.summary

It appears that your charts are an argument that more photons reduces picture quality and that there is nothing you can do about it. Yet here you claim that better micro lenses can correct the problem.

Argh. I meant more pixels, not more photons. I really hate typing as a means of communication.

The number of collected photons is a fundamental limit to picture
quality. Dynamic range can be no greater than the number of collected
photons, and noise is set by Poisson statistics. That is independent
of the efficiency of collection. You can never do better than
Poisson statistics. Thus, in any light collection system, the system's
dynamic range and noise is set by the number of photons you actually collect.
Other noise sources in the electronics only add to the noise, so noise
due to the random arrival times of photons is the best one can do.
This is a fundamental physics limit, and in general is called photon noise,
or photon noise limited.

So, either the limit on sensor size has been reached as you said, or it can be increased further with better micro lenses or other engineering solutions, which you also said. It seems to me to be a contradiction, so please understand if a simple tax accountant seems confused.

Let me try and explain and please ask further questions if what I say
is not clear to you (or anyone else reading).

So we've established photon noise is a fundamental limit. The noise in
a light signal is the square root of the number of photons collected.
So if you collect 90,000 photons, the noise is 300, thus the
signal-to-noise ratio = 90,000/300 = 300. The dynamic range is
90,000. Let's say we have no other noise sources in our sensor or
electronics, so we say the system is photon noise limited and
has reached a fundamental limit. A fundamental limit is not
an absolute best that can be done limit.

But that does not mean it can't be improved. Let's say the sensor
converts 1/3 of the photons that are incident on the pixel, and
let's say the dead space on the sensor is about 20% (the lines
between pixels and support electronics on the pixel that are
not sensitive to light). We say the Quantum Efficiency (QE)
is 33% and the active area, or fill factor, of each pixel is
80%.

So we can do a couple of things: we can improve the QE or
the fill factor. Micro lenses collect light from a larger
area and focus it down to smaller spot. Manufacturing 8 to
10 million tiny lenses is not easy and manufacturing processes
to do that have been improved over the years. That is what
Canon announced with the 1D mark III: they shrunk the pixel size
and improved the micro lenses to keep the total light collected
the same.

An analogy is collecting rain drops in buckets in your yard
during a rain storm. Lets say you place 100 buckets on a 10x10
grid spaced every foot. The buckets are 0.5 foot in diameter.
Let's say the rain fall is constant all day. Let's also say
the rain drops arrive at random intervals and are modeled
by Poisson statistics (probably a good assumption in reality).
Say we collect for one hour.
The amount of rain in each bucket is not the same. The noise
we get in measuring the amount of water in each bucket is
the square root of the number of rain drops in the bucket.
Our data regarding measuring the amount of water is
"rain drop noise limited."

Now let's replace the 0.5 foot diameter buckets with buckets
measuring 0.75 foot in diameter but still spaced every foot.
That increases our collection efficiency from 20% to 44%.
We collect more water in the same interval, and our measured
result will be a little more precise because we collected
more rain drops. We can maximize out efficiency by designing
square buckets that are 1-foot in outside dimension increasing
our collection efficiency to almost 100% (the width of the buckets
limits us a little).

Another way we could improve efficiency with our 0.5-foot diameter
buckets is to put funnels over each bucket. Say the funnel was
1-foot square at the top. We've increased efficiency to near 100% without
changing the bucket.

If we want to collect even more photons, we must use larger buckets
(or buckets + funnels) spaced at larger intervals. For example we
could use square buckets 2-feet on a side and double the area our
buckets cover. We would collect 4-times the number of rain drops
as our 1-foot square buckets. All the system have been Poisson
noise limited.

Our buckets have been 100% efficient (assuming nice metal or plastic
buckets). Lets say we make the buckets out of some absorbing
material, so we lose some water. The water lost to absorption
is not counted when we measure the depth of water in the
bucket. The noise we measure from bucket to bucket is the
square root of the number of drops making up the water in the
bucket. We are still Poisson statistics limited, and we still
say we are "rain drop noise limited."

So we can have photon detectors that are not perfect and which could
be improved, but the noise we see from the system is photon noise limited
and improving other electronics will not improve the noise we see
in our images. We say the system is photon noise limited.

Dos this help?

Roger
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nikon D40 vs D40x ISO newbie question
    ... measuring the amount of water in each bucket is the square root of the number of rain drops in the bucket. ... All cameras exhibit some fixed pattern noise and it differs from camera to camera as well as from model to model. ... square root of the number of converted photons. ... our 10x10 array of buckets collecting rain. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Nikon D40 vs D40x ISO newbie question
    ... I meant more pixels, not more photons. ... dynamic range and noise is set by the number of photons you actually collect. ... An analogy is collecting rain drops in buckets in your yard ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: The myth of the "smaller" 4/3rds lens
    ... buckets collect more rain drops; ... P&S digital often has ISO 50 right? ... an image in low light though yes the cost is more noise & ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Will Radio Engineering be QMs worst nightmare?
    ... >> radiate any photons (other than thermal noise photons which will ... >> certainly swamp any possiblility of detecting any you might radiate) ... > Thermal noise can be overcome with drop in temperature. ... Ham radio operators bounce VHF and UHF radio signals off of the moon. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: how does light cause interference phenomena?
    ... electronics noise is a useful signal for measurement purposes. ... A flute produces a near perfect sine wave. ... a particular transition of energy states produces single energy photons ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)