Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:30 GMT
King Sardon <KSardon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The 1.3x format is an unnecessary step-child of a format. It is stuck
between the legacy 35mm sized frame and the lightweight and practical
1.6x sensors.
You 1D Mark III users have to pay for and lug around full-frame lenses
and throw away 37% of the images they cast because they are cropped
off.
And with the 10 frames per second that they shoot, you get to throw
away 37% ten times every second.
Your precious $2000 14mm lens wilts to a mere 18mm with the 1.3x crop.
Likewise the exciting 24mm becomes a boring 34mm. And the 15mm fisheye
becomes a 20mm abortion.
The rest of us, the 1.6 crop crowd, march off to a bright digital
future laughing in our shirts at the 1.3x prima donnas.
Well said [with a bit much flare at the end] and it is exactly what I was
trying to communicate [apparently ineffectively].
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: Paul Furman
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- References:
- Canon 5D & 30D
- From: Bill
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: RichA
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: Thomas T. Veldhouse
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: MarkČ
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: Thomas T. Veldhouse
- Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- From: King Sardon
- Canon 5D & 30D
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- Next by Date: Re: Canon deems women photogs inferior to men
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- Next by thread: Re: Canon 5D & 30D
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|