rec.photo.digital.slr-systems

• Date Index

---

• DSLR won't meter longer than 30 seconds exposures., Paul Furman
  • Re: DSLR won't meter longer than 30 seconds exposures., Ken Lucke
  • Re: DSLR won't meter longer than 30 seconds exposures., MarkČ
    • Re: DSLR won't meter longer than 30 seconds exposures., Ken Lucke
• Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, Bruce
  • Re: Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, Dr Hfuhruhurr
    • Re: Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, C J Campbell
    • Re: Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, C J Campbell
  • Re: Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, Rudy Benner
  • Re: Nikon Capture 4.4 & D80, Adrian Boliston
• New Year New Lenses, nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New Year New Lenses, Ken Lucke
  • Re: New Year New Lenses, Pete D
    • Re: New Year New Lenses, DAVE PRICE
      • Re: New Year New Lenses, Pete D
      • Re: New Year New Lenses, Adrian Boliston
• Weather protective camera bag?, Eric Edwards
  • Re: Weather protective camera bag?, Wayne J. Cosshall
  • Re: Weather protective camera bag?, MarkČ
    • Re: Weather protective camera bag?, Eric Edwards
      • Re: Weather protective camera bag?, Wayne J. Cosshall
  • Re: Weather protective camera bag?, Joseph Meehan
• Photoshop Plugin, PH
  • Re: Photoshop Plugin, Paul Mitchum
    • Re: Photoshop Plugin, Doug MacDonald
  • Re: Photoshop Plugin, Avery
    • Re: Photoshop Plugin, PH
    • Re: Photoshop Plugin, C J Campbell
• Re: Epson R1800 Continuous Ink System, tomm42
  • Re: Epson R1800 Continuous Ink System, frederick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Epson R1800 Continuous Ink System, tomm42
  • Re: Epson R1800 Continuous Ink System, tomm42
  • Re: Epson R1800 Continuous Ink System, tomm42
• Bird Photography Lens, Bruce
  • Re: Bird Photography Lens, AustinMN
  • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
    • Re: Bird Photography Lens, MarkČ
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, MarkČ
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Doug Payne
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, MarkČ
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, John McWilliams
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Rebecca Ore
    • Re: Bird Photography Lens, David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: Bird Photography Lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Tien
    • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Jan Böhme
  • Re: Bird Photography Lens, Avery
• Software, Robert Nabors
  • Re: Software, Paul Furman
  • Re: Software, Bigguy
  • Re: Software, Matt Clara
    • Re: Software, John McWilliams
      • Re: Software, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Software, John McWilliams
      • Re: Software, C J Campbell
  • Re: Software, C J Campbell
• Re: Shots with a 31mm Limited Pentax lens, Andrew MacPherson
• Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, m II
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, Phil, Non-Squid
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, VC
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, VC
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, MarkČ
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, Randall Ainsworth
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Randall Ainsworth
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Randall Ainsworth
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Andrey Tarasevich
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, TriStar
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, TriStar
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, Matt Clara
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, MarkČ
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Boring sunset photos, MarkČ
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Matt Clara
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, Deputy Dog
  • Re: Boring sunset photos, Scubabix
    • Re: Boring sunset photos, Ken Lucke
• All latest cameras., shawn
• Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, allanmb
  • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, 3Putt from South Carolina
    • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, Recycle THIS
      • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, 3Putt from South Carolina
      • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, MarkČ
      • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, ink
      • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, Recycle THIS
      • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, 3Putt from South Carolina
    • Re: Sigma 135-400 or 170-500? Advice please, allanmb
• Questions re DSLR screens, Tony
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, MarkČ
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Pete D
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony Polson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony Polson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, mark.mai@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, MarkČ
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, MarkČ
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Toni Nikkanen
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Toni Nikkanen
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, John McWilliams
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Toni Nikkanen
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Toni Nikkanen
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony Polson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, J . Clarke
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony Polson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Alan Browne
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, POHB
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Bill Funk
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Randall Ainsworth
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Andrew MacPherson
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Skip
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Bill Funk
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, J . Clarke
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Randall Ainsworth
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Tony Polson
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Bill Funk
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, MarkČ
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Randall Ainsworth
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, MarkČ
      • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, C J Campbell
    • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, HankB
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens - Sony does..., Frank
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, David Dyer-Bennet
  • Re: Questions re DSLR screens, DoN. Nichols
• Expodisc, Blah
  • Re: Expodisc, Rudy Benner
    • Re: Expodisc, Blah
      • Re: Expodisc, Rudy Benner
      • Re: Expodisc, Paul Mitchum
  • Re: Expodisc, Slack
  • Re: Expodisc, Alan Browne
    • Re: Expodisc, MarkČ
      • Re: Expodisc, Paul Mitchum
      • Re: Expodisc, Doug MacDonald
• Sigma 170-500mm, Bruce
  • Re: Sigma 170-500mm, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
• D70 ISO Auto, Bruce
  • Re: D70 ISO Auto, Sheldon
    • Re: D70 ISO Auto, Bruce
      • Re: D70 ISO Auto, Dimitris M
  • Message not available
    • Re: D70 ISO Auto, Joan
      • Re: D70 ISO Auto, RG
      • Re: D70 ISO Auto, Joan
• Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
  • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, mark . thomas . 7
  • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Michael Schnell
  • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Rudy Benner
  • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Dr. Georg N.Nyman
    • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
    • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
  • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Bart van der Wolf
    • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Bart van der Wolf
      • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Pete D
      • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
      • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Pete D
      • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
    • Re: Enlarging digital images - how big is big?, Doug MacDonald
• The best of red or how red is your red., Doug MacDonald
  • Re: The best of red or how red is your red., mark . thomas . 7
• Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, RichA
  • Message not available
    • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, John McWilliams
  • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, Ken Johnston
    • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, MarkČ
  • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, C J Campbell
    • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, RichA
  • Re: Nikon takes the lead in Japan market, Phil
• Re: Little Taste of the D200, Alan Browne
  • Re: Little Taste of the D200, Matt Clara
• Pentax K100D better than istD?, martinbarry55@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Pentax K100D better than istD?, Marc Sabatella
    • Re: Pentax K100D better than istD?, Paul Mitchum
    • Re: Pentax K100D better than istD?, martinbarry55@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Pentax K100D better than istD?, Marc Sabatella
• Capture and view stereoscopic Images with your camera, Mathew Orman
  • Re: Capture and view stereoscopic Images with your camera, CJS
    • Re: Capture and view stereoscopic Images with your camera, PH
    • Re: Capture and view stereoscopic Images with your camera, Mathew Orman
• Amazing Photographs of Naked Woman, Amy
  • Re: Amazing Photographs of Naked Woman, Charles Schuler
    • Re: Amazing Photographs of Naked Woman, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Amazing Photographs of Naked Woman, Fletis Humplebacker
• Kodak stages a comeback, Doug Payne
  • Re: Kodak stages a comeback, Rudy Benner
  • Re: Kodak stages a comeback, C J Campbell
  • Re: Kodak stages a comeback, Paul Furman
    • Re: Kodak stages a comeback, Doug Payne
    • Re: Kodak stages a comeback, AustinMN
• c the ultimate slr images here www.i-search.co.in, sftwrpro
• Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Paul Furman
  • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Colin_D
    • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Charles Gillen
    • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Prometheus
  • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Skip
  • Re: Distance markings on MF lens should be converted for APS?, Alan Browne
• what camera for a teenager, william kossack
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rudy Benner
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rudy Benner
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rudy Benner
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Bill Funk
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, mike vore
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Bill Funk
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, dwight
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Geir Eivind Mork
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Dr Hfuhruhurr
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Joan
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Mike Fields
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Bill Funk
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Geir Eivind Mork
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Stefan Patric
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, Doug McDonald
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Marc Sabatella
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, Adrian Boliston
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, David J Taylor
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Dr Hfuhruhurr
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, Paul Furman
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Alexander Arnakis
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Adrian Boliston
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Alexander Arnakis
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Paul Furman
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, David Dyer-Bennet
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Jim Redelfs
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Paul Mitchum
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Sheldon
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Adrian Boliston
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, J . Clarke
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Doug Robbins
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Neil Harrington
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
  • Re: what camera for a teenager, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
    • Re: what camera for a teenager, william kossack
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Bill Funk
      • Message not available
      • Re: what camera for a teenager, Rebecca Ore
• We have sent you an invitation to join this club!, militaryfriends . marketing
  • Re: We have sent you an invitation to join this club!, Ken Lucke
• D200 Focusing Problems, JimmyG
  • Re: D200 Focusing Problems, Paul Furman
  • Re: D200 Focusing Problems, Jeremy Nixon
  • Re: D200 Focusing Problems, Michael Schnell
• What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
  • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Doug MacDonald
  • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., babaloo
    • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Ken Lucke
  • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., David J Taylor
    • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Neil Harrington
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Neil Harrington
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., C J Campbell
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., David J Taylor
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Neil Harrington
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., David J Taylor
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Neil Harrington
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., David J Taylor
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., MarkČ
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., David J Taylor
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Mike Fields
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., MarkČ
  • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
    • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., MarkČ
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., MarkČ
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., MarkČ
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Prometheus
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., RichA
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Bill Funk
      • Re: What is worse than a flimsy plastic DSLR housing? I found something FAR worse., Neil Harrington
• attn: lemmie - genuinely inviting dvd video - iv uz - (1/1), wadsworth
• Dutch photo website, Pjotr-images
• Sony DSC-T9 exposure bracketing problem, d-fens
• Sigma EX 105 Macro Lense for D-SLR problem, shhe33
  • Re: Sigma EX 105 Macro Lense for D-SLR problem, tomm42
  • Re: Sigma EX 105 Macro Lense for D-SLR problem, David Dyer-Bennet
• Nikon D70 for Night Photography, microchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Nikon D70 for Night Photography, bob
  • Re: Nikon D70 for Night Photography, C J Campbell
  • Re: Nikon D70 for Night Photography, k-man
• What do you think about HDR?, Phil, Non-Squid
  • Re: What do you think about HDR?, G.T.
    • Re: What do you think about HDR?, Phil, Non-Squid
    • Re: What do you think about HDR?, Dave Devine
      • Re: What do you think about HDR?, AustinMN
    • Re: What do you think about HDR?, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What do you think about HDR?, TriStar
  • Re: What do you think about HDR?, C J Campbell
  • Re: What do you think about HDR?, Petri Lopia
• Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Doug McDonald
  • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Colin_D
    • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Bill Funk
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, default
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, MarkČ
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, MarkČ
      • Re: Your opinion of Canon 400D, Paul J Gans
• Good EXIF Browser?, Phil, Non-Squid
  • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
    • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Phil, Non-Squid
    • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Siggy
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Siggy
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Siggy
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Charlie Choc
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Prometheus
    • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Siggy
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, donLouis
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, J . Clarke
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, donLouis
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, J . Clarke
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, G.T.
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, l v
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, J . Clarke
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, l v
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, John McWilliams
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Prometheus
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, John McWilliams
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, G.T.
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Doug MacDonald
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, G.T.
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Prometheus
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, donLouis
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, mark . thomas . 7
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Doug Freese
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, mark . thomas . 7
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Doug MacDonald
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, G.T.
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, B'inyamin Cramer
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, B'inyamin Cramer
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Joan
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, G.T.
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, MrB
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Toni Nikkanen
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Alan Browne
  • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Tiny Tim
  • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Doug Payne
  • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Adrian Boliston
  • Re: Good EXIF Browser?, Paul Furman
• Re: Using Nikon non-AI lenses on D70, etc., tomm42
• Is DP Review ever on line any more??, Pete D
  • Re: Is DP Review ever on line any more??, Douglas
    • Re: Is DP Review ever on line any more??, Martijn van Duijn
    • Re: Is DP Review ever on line any more??, Pete D
      • Re: Is DP Review ever on line any more??, just bob
      • Re: Is DP Review ever on line any more??, just bob
• Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar Linsen mit Pentax K100D, schneesieber
• 10 vs 8 MP, VC
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Jan Böhme
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Alan Browne
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, babaloo
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, MarkČ
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Alan Browne
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Doug Robbins
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, MarkČ
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Prometheus
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Alan Browne
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, David Kilpatrick
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, dennis@home
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, C J Campbell
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Paul J Gans
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, C J Campbell
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, dennis@home
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, C J Campbell
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, C J Campbell
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, MarkČ
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, C J Campbell
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, MarkČ
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Steve Wolfe
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Colin_D
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, VC
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, J . Clarke
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Colin_D
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Colin_D
      • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, J . Clarke
  • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Darrell Larose
    • Re: 10 vs 8 MP, Fred McKenzie
• Re: Cuba II, David Dyer-Bennet
• Re: Epson 3800 and HP Z3100 printer reviews, Joan
  • Re: Epson 3800 and HP Z3100 printer reviews, G.T.
• Re: How to simulate macro photography of models on real photos in Photoshop, Jack Mac
  • Re: How to simulate macro photography of models on real photos in Photoshop, Wayne J. Cosshall
• Recommend a new camera bag, JPSnuffy
  • Re: Recommend a new camera bag, just bob
• Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, Alan Browne
  • Message not available
    • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, Scott W
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, David J Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, David J Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dynamic Range of RAW digital sensor data, Timo Autiokari
• Unable to access dpreview site, chevron
  • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, Jeff R.
    • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, chevron
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, Pete D
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, MarkČ
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, Pete D
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, Jeff R.
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, MarkČ
      • Re: Unable to access dpreview site, Doug Robbins
• Step Down Rings, Joan
  • Re: Step Down Rings, Sheldon
    • Re: Step Down Rings, Skip
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Skip
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Tony Polson
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Tony Polson
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Skip
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Matt Clara
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Skip
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Step Down Rings, Rudy Benner
    • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, PanHandler
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, PanHandler
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Tony Polson
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, G.T.
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, G.T.
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, G.T.
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
      • Re: Step Down Rings, G.T.
      • Re: Step Down Rings, irwell
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Tony Polson
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Alan Browne
      • Re: Step Down Rings, G.T.
      • Re: Step Down Rings, Joan
  • Re: Step Down Rings, Alan Browne
• Lighting book recommendations, Blah
  • Re: Lighting book recommendations, CJS
    • Re: Lighting book recommendations, joe mama
      • Re: Lighting book recommendations, Blah
  • Re: Lighting book recommendations, Matt Clara
    • Re: Lighting book recommendations, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Lighting book recommendations, Matt Clara
• Nikon Lens Hoods, Adrian Boliston
  • Message not available
    • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, Adrian Boliston
      • Message not available
      • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, Adrian Boliston
  • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, Jeremy Nixon
    • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, Jeremy Nixon
      • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, Jeremy Nixon
  • Re: Nikon Lens Hoods, David Ruether
• EOS-350D stays at "999", no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", Steve Wolfe
    • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", just bob
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", Pete D
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", Steve Wolfe
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", John McWilliams
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: EOS-350D stays at "999", MarkČ
• Cable Release on Nikon DSLR Cameras, Bill Helbron
  • Re: Cable Release on Nikon DSLR Cameras, Rudy Benner
  • Re: Cable Release on Nikon DSLR Cameras, Brian Sullivan
  • Re: Cable Release on Nikon DSLR Cameras, cjcampbell
• All kinds of cameras., shawn
• what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
  • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., G.T.
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., achilleaslazarides
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Doug MacDonald
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., J . Clarke
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., G.T.
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., G.T.
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Paul Furman
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Message not available
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
  • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
    • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Douglas
  • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Alan Browne
    • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Alan Browne
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Matt Clara
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Alan Browne
      • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Andrew Haley
  • Re: what's new on the "how can we possibly give a sh*t" horizon? I up and bought a D200 last night., Annika1980
• MT-24EX extension cable, Marcus
  • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, Mark
  • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, Prometheus
    • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, Mark
      • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, David Littlewood
      • Re: MT-24EX extension cable, Mike Fields
• Free sample of Photoworld mag latest issue, David Kilpatrick
• Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Paige Miller
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Doug Payne
    • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Paige Miller
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Rudy Benner
    • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, darkroommike
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Phil, Non-Squid
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Sheldon
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, tomm42
  • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Floyd L. Davidson
    • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Mike Fields
      • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Mike Fields
      • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Using Nikon D80 below freezing, Mike Fields
• New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
  • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, Ken Lucke
    • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, Ken Lucke
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
  • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, Barry Pearson
    • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, Barry Pearson
  • Message not available
    • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, John Francis
      • Re: New tool to view metadata from image files, DoN. Nichols
• Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Geo
  • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., jhthurman
    • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Dr. Georg N.Nyman
    • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Not Disclosed
  • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Not Disclosed
    • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., cjcampbell
      • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: New Nikon DSLR announced..., Richard H.
• Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
  • Message not available
    • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, dwight
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, G.T.
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, G.T.
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, G.T.
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, J . Clarke
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bill Funk
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Phil, Non-Squid
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Message not available
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, J . Clarke
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Charles
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Charles
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Bob G
      • Message not available
      • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Phil, Non-Squid
  • Re: Focus discrepancies in Rebel XT and XTi, manual and auto focus, Douglas
• Canon Rebel XT, PH
  • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Charles Schuler
    • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
      • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Charles Schuler
  • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Joseph Meehan
    • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
      • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
      • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Phil, Non-Squid
      • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
    • Re: Canon Rebel XT, King Sardon
  • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Charles
    • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
  • Re: Canon Rebel XT, Douglas
    • Re: Canon Rebel XT, PH
• D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, George
  • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, HankB
    • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, George
      • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, Mike Coon
      • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, HankB
  • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, Mardon
    • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, George
    • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, C J Campbell
      • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: D70 Sensor Cleaning Technique, cjcampbell
• Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, jazu
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, Avery
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, Jim P.
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, just bob
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, Bill Funk
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, C J Campbell
    • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, Recycle THIS
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, King Sardon
  • Re: Rebel XT, what is your opinion about this review?, Moe & Helen
• Re: Photo Contest 21 Results, Geo
• Carrying Practices, Deputy Dog
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Greg \"_\"
  • Re: Carrying Practices, David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: Carrying Practices, Jim Redelfs
      • Re: Carrying Practices, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Carrying Practices, darkroommike
      • Re: Carrying Practices, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Carrying Practices, David Dyer-Bennet
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Bates
    • Re: Carrying Practices, Paul J Gans
  • Re: Carrying Practices, C J Campbell
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Toby
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Douglas
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: Carrying Practices, dwight
    • Re: Carrying Practices, Toby
  • Re: Carrying Practices, Bill Funk
    • Re: Carrying Practices, MadHatter
      • Re: Carrying Practices, Bill Funk
  • Re: Carrying Practices, madhobbit . geo
    • Re: Carrying Practices, DoN. Nichols
  • Re: Carrying Practices, MarkČ
    • Re: Carrying Practices, John McWilliams
      • Re: Carrying Practices, MarkČ
      • Re: Carrying Practices, John McWilliams
    • Re: Carrying Practices, Douglas
      • Re: Carrying Practices, MarkČ
• Newbee Question, TriStar
  • Re: Newbee Question, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Newbee Question, Bates
  • Re: Newbee Question, Jim Redelfs
  • Re: Newbee Question, Avery
  • Re: Newbee Question, Bill Funk
  • Re: Newbee Question, TriStar
• Re: Digital macro and depth of field articles, irwell
  • Re: Digital macro and depth of field articles, Wayne J. Cosshall
• Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, Andy Phillips
  • Re: Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, Paul Mitchum
    • Re: Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, Al Reid
      • Re: Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, PentaxSLR
      • Re: Pentax K100D Pentax Remote Assistant, PentaxSLR
• The USA Nikon vs Nikon (Gray Market) War, -cb-
  • Re: The USA Nikon vs Nikon (Gray Market) War, just bob
  • Re: The USA Nikon vs Nikon (Gray Market) War, acl
  • Re: The USA Nikon vs Nikon (Gray Market) War, gowanoh
  • Re: The USA Nikon vs Nikon (Gray Market) War, jeremy
• fungus cleaning, shini
  • Re: fungus cleaning, Alexander Arnakis
• battery chargers, Gordon Flemming
  • Re: battery chargers, Colin_D
    • Re: battery chargers, Bill
      • Re: battery chargers, Phil, Non-Squid
  • Re: battery chargers, mark . thomas . 7
    • Re: battery chargers, AustinMN
      • Re: battery chargers, Mike Fields
      • Re: battery chargers, David Dyer-Bennet
  • Re: battery chargers, Mike Coon
    • Re: battery chargers, Ken Lucke
      • Re: battery chargers, JC Dill
      • Re: battery chargers, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: battery chargers, Mike Fields
      • Re: battery chargers, AustinMN
      • Re: battery chargers, Mike Fields
      • Re: battery chargers, J . Clarke
      • Re: battery chargers, Richard H.
      • Re: battery chargers, mark . thomas . 7
    • Message not available
      • Re: battery chargers, dennis@home
    • Re: battery chargers, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: battery chargers, Bill Funk
  • Re: battery chargers, Arlene . Evans
• More on Planet82, RichA
  • Re: More on Planet82, acl
• Lensbaby 3G?, C J Campbell
  • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, just bob
    • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, just bob
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Matt Clara
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, just bob
    • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Jeff R.
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Wayne J. Cosshall
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Jeff R.
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Wayne J. Cosshall
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Jeff R.
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Wayne J. Cosshall
    • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Steve Wolfe
  • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Matt Clara
    • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Matt Clara
      • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, C J Campbell
  • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, JC Dill
    • Re: Lensbaby 3G?, Matt Clara
• Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Gisle Hannemyr
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Matt Clara
      • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Paul J Gans
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, gowanoh
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Alan Browne
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Scott W
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Wayne J. Cosshall
    • Message not available
      • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Wayne J. Cosshall
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Ken Lucke
    • Re: Using the Zone System for Digital Photography, Robert Peirce
• All cameras and its specifications., boaz
• image recovery, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: image recovery, Alan Browne
    • Re: image recovery, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: image recovery, Robert Nabors
• The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, RichA
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, VC
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, C J Campbell
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, RichA
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Jim P.
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Douglas
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Philip Homburg
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, C J Campbell
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, G.T.
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Roy Smith
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, C J Campbell
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Paul Mitchum
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Bill Funk
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, dennis@home
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Ken Lucke
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Paul Mitchum
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, dennis@home
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Bill Funk
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Charles
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, HarryO50
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, RichA
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, David Littlewood
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Tony Polson
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, David Littlewood
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Paul Mitchum
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Ken Lucke
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Joseph Meehan
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Bill K
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, C J Campbell
  • Message not available
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, jeremy
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, C J Campbell
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Colin_D
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Philip Homburg
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Roy Smith
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, darkroommike
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Tony Polson
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Tony Polson
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Alan Browne
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Marc Sabatella
      • Message not available
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Rod
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Prometheus
      • Message not available
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Neil Harrington
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Not Disclosed
  • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, PanHandler
    • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, John McWilliams
      • Re: The 3:2 ratio needs to go, it's a throwback and a stupid waste, Bill K
• For Sale: Minolta Dimage 7i with many accesories, erikeich
• Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
  • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Greg \"_\"
    • Re: Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, dennis@home
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, King Sardon
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, acl
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, dennis@home
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, dennis@home
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, dennis@home
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David Ruether
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, tomm42
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Philip Homburg
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David J Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, David Kilpatrick
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Laurence Payne
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, John McWilliams
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, JoeT
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Bill Funk
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, acl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Toby
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Paul J Gans
    • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Not Disclosed
  • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
    • Re: Wide-angle lenses, C J Campbell
      • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Neil Harrington
  • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Jon B
    • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Bill Funk
  • Re: Wide-angle lenses, Not Disclosed
• Monolight and strobe, Blah
  • Re: Monolight and strobe, Alan Browne
    • Re: Monolight and strobe, Blah
  • Re: Monolight and strobe, Little Green Eyed Dragon
  • Re: Monolight and strobe, Joseph Meehan
    • Re: Monolight and strobe, darkroommike
• LUMIJET AND LYSON PROFESSIONAL PHOTO PAPER: HUGE BONUS VALUE PACK!, editor
• Iraq IV, der Irak IV, gvdk
• Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Eric Edwards
  • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, RichA
    • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Eric Edwards
  • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Tim Bucktu
    • Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, dtong22
    • Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, dtong22
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Tim Bucktu
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Tim Bucktu
  • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, tomm42
    • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Eric Edwards
  • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Toby
    • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Eric Edwards
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Al Reid
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Eric Edwards
      • Re: Good 300mm zoom for K10D?, Al Reid
• DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, RichA
  • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, Greg
  • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, U-Know-Who
    • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, dennis@home
  • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, Not Disclosed
    • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, MarkČ
      • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, Pete D
      • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: DSLR shortages due to underestimated demand, Pete D
• The ultimate "Canon is the best" affirmation test!, RichA
  • Re: The ultimate "Canon is the best" affirmation test!, G.T.
    • Re: The ultimate "Canon is the best" affirmation test!, RichA
      • Re: The ultimate "Canon is the best" affirmation test!, G.T.
  • Re: The ultimate "Canon is the best" affirmation test!, gpaleo
• How do I reset the file number in a Pentax K10D?, Stephan Hoffmann
  • Re: How do I reset the file number in a Pentax K10D?, Bill
  • Re: How do I reset the file number in a Pentax K10D?, John Francis
    • Re: How do I reset the file number in a Pentax K10D?, Stephan Hoffmann
• Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Bob
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, dedMEET
    • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Bill
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Dave Phillips
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Bill
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Not Disclosed
    • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Neil Harrington
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, babaloo
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, gpaleo
    • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Bill
    • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, John McWilliams
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Frank B
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, C J Campbell
  • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, tomm42
    • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Bob
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, C J Campbell
      • Re: Buying a digita camera = Nikon l D80, twilson
• Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
  • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Dave
  • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Alan Browne
    • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, HarryO50
    • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Brian Sullivan
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Alan Browne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, RichA
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Ken Davey
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, G.T.
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Slack
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, drew . avis
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, drew . avis
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Dave
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Robert Brace
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, jeremy
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Dave
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, Doug Payne
      • Re: Canadians Buying Camera Equipment in the USA, twilson
• Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, RichA
  • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Greg \"_\"
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
  • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Father Kodak
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Jeroen Wenting
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bigguy
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, gpaleo
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, nick c
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Alan LeHun
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, tomm42
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, dennis@home
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, dennis@home
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, nick c
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Alan LeHun
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, dennis@home
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, dennis@home
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, ulysses
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Dave
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Skip
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Dave
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Neil Harrington
  • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, RichA
  • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Michael Schnell
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, RichA
  • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Charles
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, King Sardon
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Charles
    • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Matt Clara
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Why does Nikon keep making FF lenses?, C J Campbell
• Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
  • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Rudy Benner
  • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, dennis@home
    • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, HarryO50
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, HEMI-Powered
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, G.T.
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, HEMI-Powered
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Phil, Non-Squid
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, HEMI-Powered
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, nick c
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Prometheus
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Prometheus
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Prometheus
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Bill Funk
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, timo . autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Bill Funk
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, timo . autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, dennis@home
    • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Wolfgang Weisselberg
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Jan Böhme
      • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Timo Autiokari
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canon high ISO rumour - article, Bill Funk
• New England Digital Photography, Frank B
  • Re: New England Digital Photography, hflaxman@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: New England Digital Photography, Frank B
• Number of Actuations, Bill Gillespie
  • Re: Number of Actuations, Mac Guy
    • Re: Number of Actuations, Bill Gillespie
    • Re: Number of Actuations, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Joan
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Bill Funk
      • Message not available
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Rudy Benner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Ken Lucke
      • Message not available
      • Re: Number of Actuations, DoN. Nichols
      • Message not available
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Richard H.
      • Re: Number of Actuations, Ken Lucke
  • Message not available
    • Re: Number of Actuations, Mike Fields
• Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Skinner1
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Scott W
    • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Greg \"_\"
    • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Skinner1
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Greg \"_\"
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Joseph Meehan
    • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Skinner1
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, gowanoh
    • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Skinner1
      • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Skinner1
      • Message not available
      • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, HarryO50
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Would I benifit much by moving up to a larger pixel size image??, Bill Funk
• Is CF a Dying Format?, Jim Redelfs
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jay Beckman
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Peter A. Stavrakoglou
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Greg \"_\"
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, King Sardon
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Paul J Gans
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Mike Fields
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jer
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Tony Polson
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Matt Clara
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Philip Homburg
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill Funk
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jim Redelfs
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Scott W
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jeroen Wenting
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jer
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jer
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jim Redelfs
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, BoomBoom
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, dennis@home
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skinner1
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jim P.
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Greg \"_\"
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Greg \"_\"
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jeroen Wenting
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Tony Polson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Peter A. Stavrakoglou
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill Funk
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, dennis@home
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, John Bean
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Robert Brace
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Prometheus
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, John McWilliams
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Tony Polson
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, HankB
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jeroen Wenting
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jon B
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, J. Clarke
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jon B
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Prometheus
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, DoN. Nichols
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, C J Campbell
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, nick c
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, C J Campbell
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, RichA
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, RichA
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Alan Browne
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Michael Johnson
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Wolfgang Weisselberg
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jørn Dahl-Stamnes
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, just bob
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, MarkČ
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Skip
  • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Thomas T. Veldhouse
    • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Jeff R.
      • Re: Is CF a Dying Format?, Bill Funk
• Re: First macro lens, eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: First macro lens, Wayne J. Cosshall
• good value camera to photograph coins, revheck
  • Re: good value camera to photograph coins, Ben Brugman
    • Re: good value camera to photograph coins, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: good value camera to photograph coins, Joseph Meehan
  • Re: good value camera to photograph coins, Matt Clara
• All about cameras and its features., jim
  • Re: All about cameras and its features., Bill
    • Re: All about cameras and its features., Ken Lucke
      • Re: All about cameras and its features., Gizmo.
• D80 shutter speed question/problem, stormlady
  • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, Doug Payne
    • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, stormlady
      • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, Doug Payne
      • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, Bill
      • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, stormlady
      • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, gpaleo
  • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, tomm42
  • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, Neil Harrington
    • Re: D80 shutter speed question/problem, Neil Harrington
• Need of mechanical shutter, alertjean
  • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, james
    • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Laurence Payne
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, james
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Bill
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, james
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, C J Campbell
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, C J Campbell
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Stćle Sannerud
    • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Bill Funk
      • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, james
    • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, C J Campbell
  • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, C J Campbell
    • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Wolfgang Weisselberg
  • Re: Need of mechanical shutter, Wolfgang Weisselberg
• what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Jon B
    • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
      • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Jon B
      • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, John Francis
      • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
      • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, tomm42
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, tomm42
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Paul Mitchum
    • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
      • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Marc Sabatella
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Marc Sabatella
    • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, map
  • Re: what pentax lens for indoor portrait?, Pete D
• Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Bob
  • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Bill
  • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, John Francis
    • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, G.T.
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, John Bean
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Sophie Wilson
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, Pete D
      • Re: Pentax K10D and Samsung GX-10, m II
• Are IS lenses doomed ?, VC
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, just bob
  • Message not available
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, ForrestPhoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Scott in Florida
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Scott in Florida
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Scott in Florida
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, -hh
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, l v
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Stćle Sannerud
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John Francis
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, dennis@home
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, dennis@home
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, dennis@home
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, dennis@home
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, dennis@home
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: New Sensor Terminology. was (Are IS lenses doomed ?), Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, acl
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, acl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, acl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Tony Polson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Tony Polson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Future of FF sensors (was: Are IS lenses doomed), John McWilliams
      • Re: Future of FF sensors (was: Are IS lenses doomed), Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Future of FF sensors (was: Are IS lenses doomed), Tony Polson
      • Re: Future of FF sensors, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Eric Edwards
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Doug McDonald
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Tony Polson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, acl
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Ken Lucke
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Ken Lucke
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Tony Polson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Jay Beckman
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David J Taylor
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Prometheus
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Rebecca Ore
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, John Francis
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bill Funk
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Ray
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
      • Message not available
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, nick c
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Dyer-Bennet
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, nick c
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, nick c
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, nick c
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Ray
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, nick c
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, King Sardon
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, RichA
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, C J Campbell
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, C J Campbell
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, VC
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Joe
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, MarkČ
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Stćle Sannerud
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Neil Harrington
  • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Alan Browne
    • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Skip
      • Re: Are IS lenses doomed ?, Pete D
• Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, jazu
  • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Ken Lucke
  • Message not available
    • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, jazu
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, DHB
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Matt Clara
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Celcius
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, John McWilliams
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Laurence Payne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Matt Clara
  • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Bill
    • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, John McWilliams
      • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, HarryO50
  • Message not available
    • Re: Rebel XT, access lamp is on, HELPPPPPP, Dr Hfuhruhurr
• irreverent reviews of P-5000, DCB 40 watt, Acratech, etc., eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
• what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, mj_zheng
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Rudy Benner
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Scott W
    • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Rudy Benner
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, jeremy
    • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, MarkČ
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, MarkČ
    • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, mj_zheng
      • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Rudy Benner
      • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, mj_zheng
      • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Bigguy
      • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, tomm42
      • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Scott W
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Toby
  • Re: what's the best way to get more megapixels on nikon?, Wolfgang Weisselberg
• OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Dallas Dahms
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Rebecca Ore
    • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, DD
      • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Jon B
      • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Rebecca Ore
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, DD
    • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Jim Redelfs
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Rebecca Ore
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Ken Lucke
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, John McWilliams
  • Message not available
    • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Steve Cutchen
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, G.T.
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, C J Campbell
  • Re: OT: Newsreaders for Mac?, Savageduck
• In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, MarkČ
  • Re: In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, John McWilliams
    • Re: In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, MarkČ
      • Re: In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, MarkČ
      • Re: In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, John McWilliams
      • Re: In Like Flynn...T. Gwynn, MarkČ
• Photoshop XMP files -do I need them?, no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Photoshop XMP files -do I need them?, John Bean
    • Re: Photoshop XMP files -do I need them?, Jon Mitchell
  • Re: Photoshop XMP files -do I need them?, ilaab
    • Re: Photoshop XMP files -do I need them?, ForrestPhoto
• Lenses price, jazu
  • Re: Lenses price, acl
  • Re: Lenses price, bob
    • Re: Lenses price, Joseph Meehan
      • Re: Lenses price, Not Disclosed
  • Re: Lenses price, Wolfgang Weisselberg
    • Re: Lenses price, jeremy
  • Re: Lenses price, Charles Schuler
  • Re: Lenses price, RichA
• Back to NEF + JPEG, Steve
  • Re: Back to NEF + JPEG, Paul Furman
    • Re: Back to NEF + JPEG, John McWilliams
      • Re: Back to NEF + JPEG, Steve
• Budget Telephoto Lens Recommendation, allanmb
  • Re: Budget Telephoto Lens Recommendation, Bill Gillespie
• Rebel XT, owner mane?, jazu
  • Re: Rebel XT, owner mane?, Ken Lucke
    • Re: Rebel XT, owner mane?, Fred
      • Re: Rebel XT, owner mane?, jazu
• Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Robert Nabors
  • Message not available
    • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Robert Nabors
  • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, C J Campbell
    • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Robert Nabors
      • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Floyd L. Davidson
  • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Toby
  • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Norm Dresner
  • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Paul Furman
  • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, JR
    • Re: Nikon D200 shooting NEF+JPEG, Bill
• New England Digital Photogrpahy, Frank B
  • Re: New England Digital Photogrpahy, Frank B
• Camera Choice - further thoughts, William Marshall
  • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, darrell . larose
    • Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not - (was: Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts), David J Taylor
      • Re: Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not -, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not -, David J Taylor
      • Re: Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not -, John Francis
      • Re: Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not -, David J Taylor
      • Re: Pentax 22-bit ADC - I think not -, Ton Maas
  • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, Bill
    • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, acl
  • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, William Marshall
    • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, Bill
      • Re: Camera Choice - further thoughts, William Marshall
• 70-300mm Recommendations, Bill Helbron
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, 3Putt from South Carolina
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, say now
    • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Wolfgang Schmittenhammer
      • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Bill Helbron
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, joea1
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Bill
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Norm Dresner
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Andrew Koenig
  • Re: 70-300mm Recommendations, Neil Harrington
• How long will a DSLR body last ?, bob
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, 3Putt from South Carolina
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, bob
      • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, drew . avis
      • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Tony Polson
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, faune8
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Volker Hetzer
      • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, 3Putt from South Carolina
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, C J Campbell
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Charles Gillen
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Joseph Meehan
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Adrian Boliston
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Bob
  • Message not available
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Charles Schuler
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, RichA
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Paul Furman
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Bruce
    • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Greg \"_\"
  • Re: How long will a DSLR body last ?, Dallas Dahms
• Subscription, mhemant1985@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Subscription, Wolfgang Weisselberg
  • Re: Subscription, Jim Redelfs
  • Re: Subscription, U-Know-Who
  • Re: Subscription, Matt Clara
  • Re: Subscription, Charles Schuler
• IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
  • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, David Ruether
    • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
  • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, gpaleo
    • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
    • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, David J Taylor
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, gpaleo
  • Message not available
    • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, U-Know-Who
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, David J Taylor
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, C J Campbell
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, David J Taylor
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, map
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, Alan Browne
  • Re: IS/VR A-S assumptions, C J Campbell
• SB 600 + Ducks, Bruce
  • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, Rudy Benner
  • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, RichA
  • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, Bruce
    • Message not available
      • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, Bruce
      • Message not available
      • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, Bruce
      • Message not available
      • Re: SB 600 + Ducks, Bruce
• Tokina 12-24, U-Know-Who
  • Re: Tokina 12-24, bmoag
    • Re: Tokina 12-24, David Ruether
    • Re: Tokina 12-24, U-Know-Who
      • Re: Tokina 12-24, David Ruether
      • Re: Tokina 12-24, David Ruether
      • Re: Tokina 12-24, per
      • Re: Tokina 12-24, default
      • Re: Tokina 12-24, Charles Gillen
• Canon 430EX second hand price?, protozoa
  • Re: Canon 430EX second hand price?, John McWilliams
  • Re: Canon 430EX second hand price?, Pat
• Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, Ray Fischer
  • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, Steve Cutchen
  • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, Steve Wolfe
    • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, J. Clarke
      • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, John McWilliams
    • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, Richard L. Wohlers
  • Re: Best lense on a Canon 5d for OCR, Joseph Meehan
• PAL to NTSC?, Carlos Santana
  • Re: PAL to NTSC?, Laurence Payne
  • Re: PAL to NTSC?, Alan Browne
    • Re: PAL to NTSC?, irwell
  • Re: PAL to NTSC?, irwell
  • Re: PAL to NTSC?, Rod Williams
• Other Lighting Sources - II - CRI, Alan Browne
• EOS-350D filename variations, no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, Stephen M. Dunn
    • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, Nursey
    • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, Nursey
  • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, John McWilliams
    • Re: EOS-350D filename variations, no-spam2@xxxxxxxxx
• Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, ForrestPhoto
  • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Charles Gillen
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Matt Clara
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, MarkČ
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, ForrestPhoto
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Skip
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Greg \"_\"
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Alan Browne
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Charles Gillen
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, MarkČ
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Alan Browne
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Not Disclosed
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Greg \"_\"
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Mardon
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Alan Browne
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Greg \"_\"
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, Alan Browne
  • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, MarkČ
  • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, mark . thomas . 7
  • Message not available
    • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, ForrestPhoto
      • Re: Portrait with 5D + 135 mm f/2, JoeT
• Olympus price insanity, RichA
• hawk, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
• Website Update www.bn-images.com, bn-images
  • Re: Website Update www.bn-images.com, bn-images
• canvas prints (poster size), Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
  • Re: canvas prints (poster size), tomm42
    • Re: canvas prints (poster size), Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
  • Re: canvas prints (poster size), Slack
• ..., MarkČ
  • Re: ...., Joan
  • Re: ..., Bob
    • Re: ..., Rudy Benner
  • Re: ..., Fritto Misto
    • Re: ..., Mike Fields
  • Re: ..., Not Disclosed
• Re: "grey cameras", Michael Meissner
  • Re: "grey cameras", jeremy
    • Re: "grey cameras", derek_c
      • Re: "grey cameras", HarryO50
      • Re: "grey cameras", Bill Funk
      • Re: "grey cameras", HarryO50
      • Re: "grey cameras", Bill Funk
      • Re: "grey cameras", Robert Brace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "grey cameras", HarryO50
• Vibration/shake control lenses?, 3Putt from South Carolina
  • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Stephen M. Dunn
  • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Paul Furman
    • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Savageduck
    • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, tomm42
  • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, per
    • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, David J Taylor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vibration/shake control lenses?, Neil Harrington
• New photography site, tvegas
• All types of cameras with its detailed reviews., boaz
• Re: Full Moon, Angus Manwaring
• lens question, stormlady
  • Re: lens question, Buy_Sell
  • Re: lens question, Richard H.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Lens question, jazu
    • Re: Lens question, MarkČ
    • Re: Lens question, dennis@home
    • Re: Lens question, tomm42
    • Re: Lens question, David Dyer-Bennet
    • Re: Lens question, babaloo
    • Re: Lens question, dream_ace
      • Re: Lens question, Tony Polson
      • Re: Lens question, J . Clarke
      • Re: Lens question, Tony Polson
      • Re: Lens question, David Dyer-Bennet
• Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Steve Koterski
  • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, David Kilpatrick
    • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Steve Koterski
  • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Fred McKenzie
    • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Steve Koterski
    • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Alan Browne
  • Re: Question about Sony A100K and brand compatibility, Alan Browne
• Night sky shots, Peter
  • Re: Night sky shots, AustinMN
    • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
      • Re: Night sky shots, AustinMN
      • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
  • Re: Night sky shots, Fred McKenzie
    • Re: Night sky shots, JC Dill
      • Re: Night sky shots, Paul Furman
    • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
      • Re: Night sky shots, Fred McKenzie
      • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
      • Re: Night sky shots, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
      • Re: Night sky shots, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Night sky shots, Fred McKenzie
      • Re: Night sky shots, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: Night sky shots, Alan LeHun
      • Re: Night sky shots, Bill Funk
      • Re: Night sky shots, Alan Browne
      • Re: Night sky shots, Bill Funk
      • Re: Night sky shots, Alan LeHun
      • Re: Night sky shots, Alan Browne
      • Re: Night sky shots, Bill Funk
  • Re: Night sky shots, RichA
  • Re: Night sky shots, ForrestPhoto
    • Re: Night sky shots, Peter
• Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Frank B
  • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Alan Browne
    • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Frank B
  • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Joseph Meehan
    • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), John McWilliams
      • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Frank B
    • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Frank B
  • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Matt Clara
    • Re: Ireland - New Gallery (Nikon D50, Nikon 18-200 VR), Frank B
• Perspective in then and now photos, John McWilliams
  • Re: Perspective in then and now photos, Jeff R.
  • Re: Perspective in then and now photos, Bill K
• Re: End of an Era, Alan Browne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: End of an Era, derek_c
• Re: Sony A100 anti-shake test, Alan Browne
  • Re: Sony A100 anti-shake test, Skip
• Cameras and its specifications., shawn
• Test don't read, Thomas
  • Re: Test don't read, Ken Lucke
  • Re: Test don't read, AustinMN
    • Re: Test don't read, Alan Browne
      • Re: Test don't read, Peter Chant
      • Re: Test don't read - NO READ IT , DAMNIT!!!, Alan Browne
      • Re: Test don't read - NO READ IT , DAMNIT!!!, Peter Chant
      • Re: Test don't read - NO READ IT , DAMNIT!!!, Alan Browne
      • Great TV test patterns (was: Test don't read - NO READ IT , DAMNIT!!!), John McWilliams
      • Re: Great TV test patterns, Alan Browne
  • Re: Test don't read, jazu
    • Re: Test don't read, bob crownfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Test don't read, Thomas
  • Test don't read, Thomas
    • Re: Test don't read, Celcius
• Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, madhobbit . geo
  • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, jeremy
  • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, Derek Fountain
    • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, madhobbit . geo
  • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, bmoag
  • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, Chuck
  • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, Mardon
    • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, Mardon
    • Re: Colour management for non-colour-managed apps?, Andrew Haley
• memory card speed, allanmb
  • Re: memory card speed, Dr Hfuhruhurr
  • Re: memory card speed, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: memory card speed, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: memory card speed, allanmb
      • Re: memory card speed, Dr Hfuhruhurr
      • Re: memory card speed, Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
      • Re: memory card speed, Smokey
  • Re: memory card speed, just bob
  • Re: memory card speed, Phisherman
    • Re: memory card speed, Jon B
• Canon lens repair, allanmb
  • Re: Canon lens repair, Jon B
  • Re: Canon lens repair, RichA
    • Re: Canon lens repair, Bill
    • Re: Canon lens repair, Tom Ross
      • Re: Canon lens repair, allanmb
• Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
  • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Charles Schuler
    • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, cel
    • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
    • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Frank ess
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Charles Schuler
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Matt Clara
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Frank ess
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Charles Schuler
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Frank ess
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Frank ess
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Peter
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Peter
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Jack Mac
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Jack Mac
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Peter
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, nick c
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Slack
    • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, cel
  • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, mark . thomas . 7
  • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, RichA
    • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, U-Know-Who
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, RichA
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, RichA
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, David Littlewood
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Tom Ross
    • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Skip
      • Message not available
      • Usenet (was: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?), John McWilliams
    • Message not available
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, RichA
      • Re: Canon 17-40mm/4L and the 5D?, Bo-Ming Tong
• Build quality?, Charles Schuler
  • Re: Build quality?, RichA
  • Re: Build quality?, Charles Gillen
  • Re: Build quality?, jeremy
    • Re: Build quality?, Charles Schuler
      • Re: Build quality?, BoomBoom
      • Re: Build quality?, Wolfgang Weisselberg
      • Re: Build quality?, Jon B
      • Re: Build quality?, jeremy
  • Re: Build quality?, Not Disclosed
    • Re: Build quality?, Charles Schuler
      • Re: Build quality?, C J Campbell
  • Re: Build quality?, Sheldon
    • Re: Build quality?, jeremy
      • Re: Build quality?, DHB
  • Re: Build quality?, m II
    • Re: Build quality?, Laurence Payne
  • Re: Build quality?, Wolfgang Weisselberg
  • Re: Build quality?, Charles Schuler
    • Re: Build quality?, RichA
      • Re: Build quality?, Skip
      • Re: Build quality?, RichA
      • Re: Build quality?, Skip
      • Re: Build quality?, ink
      • [OT] Re: Build quality?, Wolfgang Weisselberg
      • Re: [OT] Re: Build quality?, jeremy
      • Re: [OT] Re: Build quality?, Skip
      • Re: [OT] Re: Build quality?, John McWilliams
• Re: Parametrs??, Paul Furman
• Re: cleaning cmos sensor, Paul Furman
• Re: The PHLOG, Paul Furman
  • Re: The PHLOG, C J Campbell
• Re: Flash Umbrella Info?, John McWilliams
  • Re: Flash Umbrella Info?, Randall Ainsworth
    • Re: Flash Umbrella Info?, John McWilliams
      • Re: Flash Umbrella Info?, Randall Ainsworth
• Alternate lighting sources, Alan Browne
  • Re: Alternate lighting sources, tomm42
• Re: Pentax not viable??, EyeCatcher
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pentax not viable??, Seeker
  • Re: Pentax not viable??, Seeker
    • Re: Pentax not viable??, Seeker
    • Re: Pentax not viable??, Charles Gillen
      • Re: Pentax not viable??, Alan Browne
      • Re: Pentax not viable??, jeremy
      • Re: Pentax not viable??, Marc Sabatella
      • Re: Pentax not viable??, Charles Gillen
      • Re: Pentax not viable??, jeremy
  • Re: Pentax not viable??, Alan Browne
• 300mm, which one?, jazu
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: 300mm, which one?, Jon B
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, faune8
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, Fred Anonymous
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, Dimitris M
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, Charles Schuler
    • Re: 300mm, which one?, Bill Helbron
  • Re: 300mm, which one?, oddroot
• Re: [kook] Resolution: Sony Alpha versus Canon 1DsMkII, 5D & Nikon D2X, Not Disclosed
  • Re: [kook] Resolution: Sony Alpha versus Canon 1DsMkII, 5D & Nikon D2X, VC
• Re: CORRECTED Re: Nikon SLR newb questions, Just D
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CORRECTED Re: Nikon SLR newb questions, DoN. Nichols
• A basket of D70's., RichA
  • Re: A basket of D70's., Bill Gillespie
• Sigma 100-300 f4, gpaleo
  • Re: Sigma 100-300 f4, Just D
    • Re: Sigma 100-300 f4, donLouis
      • Re: Sigma 100-300 f4, Just D
      • Re: Sigma 100-300 f4, donLouis
• Re: D70s Histogram, Alan Browne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: D70s Histogram, Ben Brugman
• Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
  • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
  • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, tomm42
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Ben Brugman
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, RichA
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, achilleaslazarides
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, acl
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Paul Furman
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Scott W
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Robert Brace
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Scott W
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry
  • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Alan Browne
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Alan Browne
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Alan Browne
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry Pearson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry Pearson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Andrew Haley
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry Pearson
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Paul Furman
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Alan Browne
  • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Robert Brace
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, DoN. Nichols
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry Pearson
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Barry Pearson
  • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Jeremy Nixon
    • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
    • Message not available
      • Re: Drawbacks of compressed NEF in D200, Miguel
• Strobe question, Blah
  • Re: Strobe question, Richard H.
  • Re: Strobe question, Blah
    • Re: Strobe question, george
      • Re: Strobe question, Blah
      • Re: Strobe question, Randy W. Sims
      • Re: Strobe question, Blah
• Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, Randall Ainsworth
  • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, RichA
    • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, U-Know-Who
      • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, RichA
      • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, MarkČ
      • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, U-Know-Who
    • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, G.T.
    • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, Randall Ainsworth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canon....not another problem!!!, Jim P.
• Re: Nikon D80 diopter adjustment, G.T.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Nikon D80 diopter adjustment, Jimmy
    • Re: Nikon D80 diopter adjustment, Roadsign
• ^*^*^*^* Bikini Contest *^*^*^*^*, Information
• Re: My 'New Lens for Christmas', hflaxman@xxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My 'New Lens for Christmas', Buy_Sell
• Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, David Kilpatrick
  • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, RichA
    • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, tomm42
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Charles Gillen
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Scott W
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, David Kilpatrick
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Laurence Payne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Mike Coon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Scott W
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Bates
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, RichA
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, RichA
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Alan Browne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Alan Browne
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Jeremy Nixon
      • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Randall Ainsworth
    • Re: Why a dust shedding system is a boon, Little Green Eyed Dragon
• Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, King Sardon
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Stephen M. Dunn
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, nick c
    • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, King Sardon
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, nick c
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Bill
    • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Bill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Jim Redelfs
    • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, VC
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Arnor Baldvinsson
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Jon B
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, RichA
    • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, U-Know-Who
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, RichA
    • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Bates
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, VC
      • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Bates
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Brutus
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Michael Johnson, PE
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
  • Re: Canon 400D vs 30D, Jon B
• Re: low end cameras, Alan Browne
  • Re: low end cameras, Scott W
• Thanks, Sheldon