Re: Apple Aperture
- From: "cjcampbell" <christophercampbell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Sep 2006 17:55:36 -0700
Paul Mitchum wrote:
Aperture is out of the running for me because it requires you to
organize your image files in a certain way. It 'imports' them into its
own file structure, much like iPhoto.
Yes and no. It does import them into its own file structure, but it is
not at all like iPhoto, which actually uses a normal folder structure
and which creates duplicate files for every edit. Aperture maintains
only one master file, unless it is exported to an external editor, and
then it creates only one copy and keeps track of all the edits in a
separate file.
You can organize your photos within Aperture any way you like.
That said, Aperture insists that all photos be kept in a single library
on a single disk; no spreading photos around on different disks. You
can create additional Aperture libraries, but you have to change the
library location in Preferences and restart Aperture. This is the
single biggest issue I have with Aperture, but I have lots of lesser
ones as well...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Aperture
- From: Paul Mitchum
- Re: Apple Aperture
- References:
- Apple Aperture
- From: Padu
- Re: Apple Aperture
- From: w . beckley
- Re: Apple Aperture
- From: Paul Mitchum
- Apple Aperture
- Prev by Date: Re: Nikkor 18-200mm VR problem?
- Next by Date: Re: Confused about "Digital" Lens
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Aperture
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Aperture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|