Re: Apple Aperture
- From: usenet@xxxxxxxxxx (Paul Mitchum)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:36:15 -0700
<w.beckley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Padu wrote:
A while ago I began testing adobe lighthouse and I was impressed. Then I
came to realize that it was soo slow that Picasa was a thousand times
better, even without all the RAW development features (I use photoshop for
that).
I was looking at the apple aperture website, and I liked it. What do you
think of it? How fast to browse pictures compared to lighthouse and picasa?
And the ultimate question... do you know if they plan to release a windows
version?
I'd put the chances of Apple releasing Aperture on Windows extremely low.
It won't happen.
The software is great, and I might even like it a bit more than Lightroom,
but its RAW output isn't (in my experience) as clean as Lightroom, so I
use Lightroom. On my machine (a two-year old dual processor G5, 2GB of
RAM) it is rather speedy, but then again so is Lightroom, so I don't know
if that tells you anything new.
Aperture is out of the running for me because it requires you to
organize your image files in a certain way. It 'imports' them into its
own file structure, much like iPhoto.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apple Aperture
- From: cjcampbell
- Re: Apple Aperture
- References:
- Apple Aperture
- From: Padu
- Re: Apple Aperture
- From: w . beckley
- Apple Aperture
- Prev by Date: Re: Lens Caps
- Next by Date: Re: Canon 70-300 IS USM lens availability
- Previous by thread: Re: Apple Aperture
- Next by thread: Re: Apple Aperture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|