Re: RAW processing - mountain photos

I process photos very little. The more processing one does the the more the
photo de grades. Get it right with the camerta or throw it out.

http://www2.hagenhosting.com/~naborswe/Libya/Libyaindex.html

Bob

"Paul Mitchum" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1hkwbrm.s1ha8h2hao1sN%usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul Furman <paul-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ken Ellis wrote:
[..]
Then I will judge the darks and the light, speculars..etc; and then if
i
feel it needs it, i will go back to the exposure comp...and save a
coupe
of versions (eg..+ and -) IN OTHER WORDS A TOO LIGHT VERS. AND A TOO
DARK ONE.

Yep, then a really big soft edged eraser brush can simulate a graduated
neutral density filter in a jiff without trying to get fussy about
detailed masking of the two versions.

Masking layer and a gradient works much better for simulating a grad ND.
Then you can alter the opacity of the top layer, too.


.