Re: New Sigma DSLR coming

"John McWilliams" <jpmcw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Or-dnaShzuvxkGvZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Albert Nurick wrote:
SkipM wrote:

"David J Taylor"
<david-taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:bmaJg.10950$r61.8059@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SkipM wrote:
[]
hmmm, interesting. Reading between the lines, it looks like
Sigma is putting all their eggs in the resolution/sensor basket,
since they ask if you could have "fundamentally better
technology, would you settle for added improved functions,
instead?" That reads, to me, like the camera will have what
Sigma considers a killer sensor, but will be relatively
de-contented. Also, looking at the brief glimpses of images they
show, it lacks the AA filter as did its predecessors, and it
still suffers from slightly yellowish skin tones... I'm
wondering what actual resolution it will offer, if the 14 refers
to the actual pixel resolution, or Sigma/Foveon's pumped up
number, 3x the actual. Or if i'ts just a progression from the
SD9/10...
14 MB advertised
-> 13.51MP actual
-> 4.5MP RGB pixel sites

Perhaps ??

That's what I'm thinking. Except I wouldn't call it 13.51 MP actual,
I'd say 4.5 MP actual, 13.51 MP color sites... After all, working in
monochrome, that would only be 4.5 MP.

If so, it won't sell much. Just like the other Sigma cameras.

It's amazing if they think the public will buy a no-name 4.5 MP DSLR in
2006.

That's one reason it's likely it will be pushed out as a 13.5 MP camera,
if not by Sigma themselves, by unscrupulous retailers. Think marketing;
think consumers driven by high MP numbers alone, same as many computers
sold on clock speed alone. (Er, not by the mostly intelligent readership
here, of course.)

--
John McWilliams

Judging from the name, SD14, I'd say it's Sigma's intention to do so, no
matter what their retailers do...

--
Skip Middleton
www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fovean Sensors
    ... Sigma is claiming their new technology is able to produce better color resulting in a higher quality print. ... It does not make a difference if it is a 1MP or a 20MP camera. ... So the real question that everybody is skirting in place of pixel count or numerical resolution is does this technology produce significantly better color that results in a groundbreaking better printing photograph other things like ink and paper set aside to warrant an industrial shift to a different technology? ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Fovean Sensors
    ... development budget of Canon or Nikon but they saw the potential and struggled with it until they finally have a viable camera. ... Sigma don't actually lie about the sensor as you and a hand full of other anti Sigma proponents make out. ... They just measure resolution differently. ... If Canon and Nikon were to separate the pixels of each colour and measure their resolution the way you seem to think is honest, these 12 megapixel cameras that don't produce any better resolution than the Sigma's do would be in real strife as far as the pixel race goes. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: New Sigma DSLR coming
    ... certainly you could reserve judgment until you at least see ... it looks like Sigma is ... That reads, to me, like the camera will have ... I'm wondering what actual resolution it will offer, if the 14 refers to the ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: New Sigma DSLR coming
    ... Sigma is putting all their eggs in the resolution/sensor basket, ... wondering what actual resolution it will offer, ... -> 4.5MP RGB pixel sites ... think consumers driven by high MP numbers alone, same as many computers sold on clock speed alone. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Fovean Sensors
    ... other anti Sigma proponents make out. ... that it is somehow dishonest to measure resolution that way. ... Sigma's do would be in real strife as far as the pixel race goes. ... There are actually multiple sensor sites on the Sigma in layers. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)