Re: Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- From: "Charlie Self" <charliediy@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 03:21:18 -0700
RichA wrote:
Mark B. wrote:
"RichA" <rander3127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156468849.932136.59320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Self-cleaning sensor. I guess dust motes really DID bother some
people, enough so
Canon made the logical move to this.
I'll be interested to see how well it works before declaring it a 'logical
move'.
Mark
Anything that keeps someone from having to touch a sensor cover until
the last possible moment is a good thing. If it works, as you said.
Nonsense. What's wrong with touching the low pass filter with the
proper tool? I do it several times a year to clean my sensor. No
problems in several years, and I don't anticipate any until I'm too old
and shaky to care. And you blathered on earlier about expensive items
to clean the filter: I think the make up brush I use cost $1.97, and
the can of air I use to charge it costs five bucks and also cleans my
keyboard and computer innards for more than a year before I run out and
buy another.
Cleaning a sensor need not take long, and need not cost much, if
anything: I think my cost amortizes out to something like a nickel a
cleaning, at most. Some people do seem to get oddball hard-to-remove
substances on the sensors, but they are in a distinct minority. Those
people need either factory cleaning or fancier liquids. The rest of us
don't.
.
- References:
- Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- From: RichA
- Re: Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- From: Mark B.
- Re: Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- From: RichA
- Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- Prev by Date: Re: 6-8 meg camera owners, will you go 10 megs?
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft couldn't afford a 126 meg CCD
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- Next by thread: Re: Canon 400D; Crow-eating time for some
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|