Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: Brian <cooloox_at_optusnet.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:05:22 +1000
Stacey wrote:
aaJoe wrote:
Because its better. So may you wallow in a complacent blur happy in
knowing your pictures won't divulge too many secrets. We wouldn't want
too much detail would we?
He's just tired of reading about the lens QC issues his favorite brand has.
If his favorite brand has a weakness (lens quality) then he has to pretend
it doesn't matter!
Up to your usual biased bs again Stacey. Put your money where your mouth is. If "you think" the Canon lenses are so poor, which they are not, then post some of your fantastic photographic images showing me this great quality you are getting with your camera that I am not getting with mine! Then I will post you some images to "prove" you are full of crap.
What annoys me in this NG is the childish "my camera is better than yours" mentality. If you prefer Nikon, use Nikon; if you prefer Canon, use Canon. Why rubbish anything that is not YOUR preferred brand. The sales figures for the professional market speaks for itself! Grow up Stacey.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: Stacey
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: John McWilliams
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- References:
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: Paul Furman
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: aaJoe
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- From: Stacey
- Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- Prev by Date: Re: European camera mfgs being hurt by pollution controls
- Next by Date: Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- Previous by thread: Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- Next by thread: Re: A Call to Overthrow the Cult of Sharpness!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|