Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Cynicor <j..tru.p.i.n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:13:49 -0400
Mark Conrad wrote:
In article <w5adnSV-3cnkgcnZRVn-qg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cynicor
<j..tru.p.i.n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm actually quite happy with that lens on my Nikon D70 and D200. Much happier than I am with my Tamron 11-18 superwide.
Sample: http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/954495/1/43871607
Great sample shots.
Are you happy with smugmug? How much of a cut do they take when you
sell a photo ?
Just curious.
Thanks. I like the ease of use on Smugmug. You only get your cut when you have a "pro" level account. If you leave the photos "at cost," you don't see your sales or get anything back. If you price your photos above the base Smugmug cost, you get 85% of the difference.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- References:
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Cynicor
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Prev by Date: Re: What would a professional charge for this?
- Next by Date: Re: Quick release
- Previous by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Next by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
