Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad <NoMailAccepted@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:40:58 GMT
In article <w5adnSV-3cnkgcnZRVn-qg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Cynicor
<j..tru.p.i.n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm actually quite happy with that lens on my Nikon D70 and D200. Much
happier than I am with my Tamron 11-18 superwide.
Sample: http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/954495/1/43871607
Great sample shots.
Are you happy with smugmug? How much of a cut do they take when you
sell a photo ?
Just curious.
Mark-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Cynicor
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Pros and Cons for using "raw" processing?
- Next by Date: Re: drugstore lab guy and the missing print...
- Previous by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Next by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Index(es):
