Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Cynicor <j..tru.p.i.n...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:09:33 -0400
Mark Conrad wrote:
Being a rank digital newbie, I let a salesman talk me into buying a
combo Canon 5D "package" including the non-Canon Sigma 105mm macro lens
instead of a regular Canon macro lens.
He claimed the Sigma was the better macro, but I suspect his motives.
Did I goof? Be brutally truthful guys, I can take it.
I'm actually quite happy with that lens on my Nikon D70 and D200. Much happier than I am with my Tamron 11-18 superwide.
Sample: http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/954495/1/43871607
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- References:
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- From: Mark Conrad
- Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Prev by Date: Sanyo VPC-HD1 high-def camcorder records to SD flash memory!
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Anyone know of a Free news service that supports Outlook Express (OT)
- Previous by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Next by thread: Re: Mistake by using a Sigma 105mm macro as "general purpose"?
- Index(es):
