Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- From: "ben brugman" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:48 +0200
So I like to distinct between the word "internal format"
(which every camera has at some point) and RAW which
is only provided with the higher end camera's.
"internal format" just another word for jpeg?
No jpeg is derived from the internal format, jpeg is NOT
an internal format.
What "high end cameras?"
There is a difference between 'higher' and 'high'.
A child which is 'higher' than it's brother does not have to be 'high'.
So when I refer to 'higher' end camera's I do not neccesary mean
high end camera's.
There is a difference in 'high' and 'higher', I do not know how this
is called in English or American.
A Canon 350D or Nikon D50 aren't very high end.No but they are higher than most point and shoots.
Ben.
--
"I have been a witness, and these pictures are
my testimony. The events I have recorded should
not be forgotten and must not be repeated."
-James Nachtwey-
http://www.jamesnachtwey.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- From: John Francis
- Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- References:
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: dtype
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Ben Brugman
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Ben Brugman
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Espen Stranger Seland
- Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- From: ben brugman
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Prev by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- Next by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Previous by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- Next by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|