Re: lens logic...
- From: "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" <username@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:59:41 -0700
Paul Furman wrote:
I vote for the 28-135 3.5 IS because it's overall faster & probably better quality and sort of medium length though definitely leaning toward the long end.
I agree. I have this lens and on some trips, that is all I take.
The IS works great whether in a dark old church in Europe,
from a boat, airplane, or walking through the forest:
http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries/gallery.alaska/web/moose.c09.12.2004.JZ3F5185.b-700.html
Roger
.
- References:
- lens logic...
- From: APT
- Re: lens logic...
- From: Paul Furman
- lens logic...
- Prev by Date: Re: Old fogey needs some advice
- Next by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- Previous by thread: Re: lens logic...
- Next by thread: Re: lens logic...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|