Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Espen Stranger Seland <ess@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:34:14 +0200
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:12:48 +0200, "Ben Brugman" <Ben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
? All raw require post processing by definition.
No they don't.
They do...
Most camera's are capable of taking raw together with a jpg.
....the in-camera jpeg is a product of the RAW.
(snipp)
The bottom line is, if the jpg is sufficient, you do not need
the raw at all.
That's true. Or I would say: If the jpeg is sufficient for your kind
of publishing (web, print etc) you don't need the raw data.
-espen
--
http://www.seland.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- From: ben brugman
- Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- References:
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: dtype
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Ben Brugman
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Ben Brugman
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Prev by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for Nikon D200 kit??
- Previous by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments DO matter with RAW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|