Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: "dtype" <drew.streib@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Mar 2006 16:24:06 -0800
Jeremy Nixon wrote:
The Nikon D2x is the only one (that I'm aware of) that does white balance
at the sensor. For the rest, it's simply a metadata setting that the raw
processor uses (or not). The D2x varies gain on individual channels to
do white balance better,
That is quite interesting, and new information to me. Thanks!
In certain settings (ones which have high saturation of a particular
color), that could in theory get you quite a bit in terms of additional
range, as you can effectively expose for each channel separately.
Pretty cool stuff. I wonder how well it works in practice.
-drew
.
- References:
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: dtype
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Paul Furman
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: dtype
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Jeremy Nixon
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Prev by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by Date: Re: lens logic...
- Previous by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Index(es):