Re: lens logic...
- From: "G.T." <getnews1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:07:18 -0800
"APT" <zendog_ak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:122om64eij9tka0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My previous post requesting lens advice produced great insight for me. Soresearching
hear is my latest logic.
I am new to photography and plan to by the Rebel XT. I have been
lenses for quite some time. I definitely prefer quality but being so new II
1) can't afford some of the better quality lenses and 2) am not quite sure
if I will use wide angle or zoom.
My interest are varied - landscape to wildlife (both of which are in
abundance where I live). But I think my keener interest is in
photojournalism and photo art.
So to get to the point. I was looking to by just one GOOD lens. But since
am not sure which focal range I will be using most I thought it may bebest
to get the cheap kit lenses (18-50 and 55-200) and see which I prefer.Then
save up and get a GOOD lens that is more suited to my interest. But in the
end this will cost more.
So here are my options:
Get the camera with the kit 18-50 and 55-200
and buy a used 28-105 3.5/4.5 (from a photographer friend)
or:
But the body only and get
the better quality 28-135 3.5 IS
Any way, I am pretty much decided on the first option but thought I would
share it with the group to see if there is anything I may be missing in my
logic. (Which wouldn't be surprising).
In all likelihood you're going to need something wider than 28mm. I used
the kit 18-55 for quite some time but the 55-200 I bought with it was
virtually worthless from 120 on up.
I'd recommend not getting the kit lens getting something in the 24-135 range
instead and then decide from there.
Greg
.
- References:
- lens logic...
- From: APT
- lens logic...
- Prev by Date: Free Video
- Next by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Previous by thread: Re: lens logic...
- Next by thread: Re: lens logic...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|