Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: "dtype" <drew.streib@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Mar 2006 11:21:58 -0800
Paul Furman wrote:
I believe WB does effect the RAW capture. It's probably not real
critical in most cases but it's like EC for different colors and will
reduce or increase the data captured to have WB set correctly.
Is this the case? Can a Bayer-pattern sensor adjust sensitivity on a
per-color basis? I guess it is technically feasible, but wasn't a
feature of sensors that I was aware of. Are you sure that this isn't
just a hint to the RAW processor that gets handled after demosaicing?
-drew
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Jeremy Nixon
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- References:
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: dtype
- Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- From: Paul Furman
- Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Prev by Date: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by Date: Re: Apple for the teacher.
- Previous by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Next by thread: Re: Why many settings arguments don't matter with RAW
- Index(es):