Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- From: "Bart van der Wolf" <bvdwolf@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 02:56:02 +0100
"Jeremy Nixon" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:121jt02773frn19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SNIP
It seems that a reasonable "solution" is to use lenses with an
image circle significantly larger than the sensor.
That by itself doesn't reduce light fall-off. In fact my TS-E 45mm f/2.8 (image circle diameter of 58.6mm) produces more vignetting than my EF 50mm f/1.4 (image circle of approx. 44? mm) at similar apertures and centered on optical axis.
I'll repeat; it's the lens *design* that determines the amount of light fall-off, within the physical/economical boundaries of a given lens.
Bart
.
- References:
- Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- From: Edward Holt
- Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- From: Skip M
- Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- From: Skip M
- Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- From: Jeremy Nixon
- Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- Next by Date: Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- Next by thread: Re: Canon Response to 5D Dark Corners
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading