Re: Canon EOS-350D



s-clark wrote:

I am recent entry into the Digital SLR game. I have a EOS 350D. I have the
kit lens which came with the camera. I also have a 28-135mm 3.5-5.6 IS lens.
I have an uncle who has the EOS 20D. And I have a friend who has the Nikon
D50.

I have been struggling with getting the pictures I wanted out of the IS lens.
I seemed to have learned what my mistakes were. Then my friend with the D50
sent me a picture. Man was it crisp. I started looking. If I right click my
JPG in Windows I can view the properties. His camera has a vertical and
horizontal resolution of 300dpi. My 350D and my uncles 20D both have a
resolution of 72dpi. Just for a comparison I looked at my old 3.3 mp Fuji and
found it was also 72dpi.

Irrelvant. These are default "print resolutions" embedded in the information part of the file with the image that have nothing to do with image quality.

To do a good job _before printing_ one does all editing at image "full size" where pixels are pixels and have no dimension (other than as presented on your monitor which is around 90 dpi).

Typically, these days, print resolution is 300 dpi (though 150 is very acceptable, and some printers default to around 400).

What COUNTS is the print size, and so you need to resample the image so that the print size and the print resolution match.

eg: a 4x6 print at 300 dpi required the image to be edited to 1200 x 1800 pixels (4x300 and 6x300) and Un-sharp masked at that resoution for sharpness.

The same image at 8x12, printed at 300 dpi, requires 2400 x 3600. Be sure to "upsample" from the original image and not the one reduced for printing at 4x6! And always Un-sharp-mask at each printed resolution.

Un-sharp maksing is an art unto itself. Be patient. Typically I begin at 100%, 0.4, 2 (sharpening factor, pixels radius and threshold values) and usually I simply manipulate the pixel radius to get to shaprness. View the image at 100% zoom (on an area of in focus detail). If you over do it, "halo" lines will apprear along contasty edges ... you've gone to far, back off.

I hope that helps.

Cheers,
Alan.




--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Low cost image sensor
    ... >I have been searching the web for a low cost image sensor. ... read to 0.1mm resolution which actually means a minimum of 200 pixels ... realistically 400 pixels would be better to ensure the resolution. ... Ideally I would like no moving parts, and no lens. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Low cost image sensor
    ... >>I have been searching the web for a low cost image sensor. ... > read to 0.1mm resolution which actually means a minimum of 200 pixels ... > realistically 400 pixels would be better to ensure the resolution. ... Ideally I would like no moving parts, and no lens. ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Megapixel vs. Zoom
    ... if your sensor is small enough and you have way too many megapixels? ... resolution is greater than that of the lensa (but will look just fine on ... of whether a lens might be not able to match the resolution of the sensor. ... just two pixels on the sensor, I suspect it would really take more than ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Resolution and pixel size not directly related?
    ... Pixel size should determine how much detail (resolution) an image ... A 12m sensor using a 100mm lens should out-resolve another ... you'd have only about 7m pixels because although the ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Nikon and Megapixels
    ... If you take a photo with a 50 million pixel sensor using a milk bottle bottom for a lense you get a huge file of a crap low res image. ... In effect, what the formula says is that no matter how good the lens, ... But when the lens performance lags so far behind the sensor already as most zooms, all lenses at f16 etc do then theres not much if any actual image improvement by improving the sensor further! ... You CANNOT increase thew resolution from a lens by having a bigger pixel count. ...
    (alt.photography)