Re: olympus are not perfect
- From: JPS@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:18:22 GMT
In message <dk3cvp$lf3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"DickA" <DickA@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Randall Ainsworth" <rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:301020051233433076%rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article <dk36ct$aqt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DickA
>> <DickA@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Also the E-500 is made of plastic!
>>
>> Shouldn't that be "are" made of plastic?
>
>Shouldn't that have been " Also E-500s are made of plastic" ?
Both "E500s are made of" and "the E500 is made of" are acceptable.
--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@xxxxxxx>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: olympus are not perfect
- From: dylan
- Re: olympus are not perfect
- References:
- Re: olympus are not perfect
- From: DickA
- Re: olympus are not perfect
- Prev by Date: Re: Photo DVD Software
- Next by Date: Re: Nikon SB-24 and D70s
- Previous by thread: Re: olympus are not perfect
- Next by thread: Re: olympus are not perfect
- Index(es):