Re: Tiff vs Jpeg
- From: "Monty" <monty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 11:37:58 GMT
Thanks for the info Nigel.
Regards
Monty
"nv" <notvalid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TuP%e.120009$G8.62180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In news:IdP%e.119991$G8.31026@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Monty <monty@xxxxxxxxxxx> scribed:
>> Can some one please tell me if there is any advantage converting RAW to
>> tiff or RAW to jpeg. Any quality difference.
>>
>> Regards To all
>>
>> Monty
>
> None, if all you do is look at your images on a monitor. It's the
> equivalent
> of looking at analogue negatives, as RAW files are the digital negative
> equivalent.
> Perhaps you might want to read a short 4-page pdf primer on this subject
> written by Bruce Fraser?
>
> http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/pdfs/understanding_digitalrawcapture.pdf
>
> hth
>
> Kind regards
> Nigel
>
>
.
- References:
- Tiff vs Jpeg
- From: Monty
- Re: Tiff vs Jpeg
- From: nv
- Tiff vs Jpeg
- Prev by Date: Re: Tiff vs Jpeg
- Next by Date: Re: CSI's cameras (the TV show)
- Previous by thread: Re: Tiff vs Jpeg
- Next by thread: Re: Tiff vs Jpeg
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|