Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: dnichols@xxxxxxxxxxx (DoN. Nichols)
- Date: 5 Aug 2005 18:26:30 -0400
In article <bjm7f1lrdktjntr09r7uvab0mn2j7teitu@xxxxxxx>, <JPS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>In message <3lgh4vF12hnn8U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>Stacey <fotocord@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>So a 300mm lens on a 1Ds works just like it does on a 20D? And I guess a
>>28mm lens provides the same usefulness on the 1Ds as it does on the 20D as
>>well.. Glad you don't think FOV is important, seems most people do.
>
>You are a simpleton. He didn't say "FOV isn't important".
>
>FOV is not *RELEVANT* to the issue of lens size, for a given focal
>length, max aperture, and usable area of focal plane.
Hmm ... what is the difference between FOV and your last
parameter "usable area of focal plane"?
Granted, a lens can have a larger "usable area" than a given
camera actually takes advantage of -- as for example a lens designed for
a full-frame 35mm mounted on a DSLR body with a 1.5 or 1.6 crop factor.
But -- there are also lenses made explicitly for the crop factor
of a DSLR which will not adequately cover a full frame 35mm. They will
have the same focal length range, and same maximum aperture, but they
will be noticeably lighter. (This is more often a consideration with
wide angle lenses than with telephotos, but I could imagine some long
lenses made somewhat lighter by restricting the coverage to a DSLR crop
factor.
>You have the same logical prowess and the same sense of responsibility
>in paraphrasing others that George Preddy has.
And it would seem that you are not properly considering what
your own words say.
Enjoy,
DoN.
--
Email: <dnichols@xxxxxxxxxxx> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: Ton Maas
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: Stacey
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: JPS
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- References:
- Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: RichA
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: Brian Baird
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: Stacey
- Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- From: JPS
- Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- Prev by Date: Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- Next by Date: Re: Another mag trashes kit lens(s)
- Previous by thread: Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- Next by thread: Re: Full-frame or 1.5 DSLR?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|