Re: Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- From: "Pete D" <no@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:34:30 GMT
"Albert Nurick" <albert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xn0e5ahccly675o005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> RichA wrote:
>
>> I personally believe there is a big potential market for a fixed-lens
>> high-end prosumer that could compete with the DSLRs. A sealed camera
>> body would eliminate the dust issue and a lens of 18-200mm would serve
>> 90+% of users out there. An external "telextender" raising the max
>> f.l. to 300mm (450mm equivalent) could be produced as well since they
>> already exist for prosumers.
>
> Amen to that. If Sony took the 828, reworked the sensor to make the
> high-ISO noise on part with a Canon 20D, made the shot-to-shot speed as
> fast as a DSLR (I hate the between-shots lag) and supported something
> like the Canon or Nikon multiple wireless flashes, I'd buy one in a
> minute.
>
> The thing that's kept me from pulling the trigger on a DSLR is the lack
> of ability to use the LCD for framing a shot, the lack of a movie mode,
> and the lack of something like the NightFraming/Nightshot feature that
> Sony has. Believe it or not, I use all of these.
So do I but my Sony V1 is used sometimes and my Pentax Ds is used others.
.
- References:
- Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- From: RichA
- Re: Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- From: Albert Nurick
- Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- Next by Date: Re: Nikkor AF or DX Lenses for best results on a Nikon D50?
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof marketers are not catering to enthusiasts
- Next by thread: Canon's 20Da in stock in Canada
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
