Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: RichA <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:32:39 -0400
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:30:01 GMT, "Pete D" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"RichA" <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:k9k0e11qoh3lh3k452ust9k2b17do3rtoh@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:11:37 GMT, "Pete D" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>He never said that Rich, go back and read it again, he said with a mere 75
>>>times scope, now pull your head in. Dickhead.
>>>
>>>"RichA" <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:b7lvd19u1ruhtfk8mm4eifvb2blgp5ujfp@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Time for some education.
>>>> Mars can NEVER look as large or be as bright
>>>> as the full moon, EVER!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Fine. Brightness and magnification have NOTHING to do with each
>> other.
>> -Rich
>
>OMG, killfile him then, but get over it. Dweeb.
>
Intellectual midget.
-Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: eawckyegcy@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- References:
- Looking for the Red Planet
- From: Vinnie
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: RichA
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: Pete D
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: RichA
- Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- From: Pete D
- Looking for the Red Planet
- Prev by Date: Re: 20D with 24~70 f2.8 tells a story in a face
- Next by Date: Re: Canon's 18 ~ 55 "Kit" lens examples
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for the Red Planet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|