Re: Wet photography is really dying
- From: Rob Morley <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:58 +0100
In article <chohensteGeneRobinson-55996A.19222911052008
@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com>, Charles Hohenstein
chohensteGeneRobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
And dry plates, and homemade paper. But there are too many film cameras620 is just respooled 120, you can slit and respool 120 to make 127, so
in use for film to disappear anytime soon, if ever. Even rollfilm sizes
like 620 and 127 are still available.
those formats can continue as long as rollfilm is available and people
can be bothered to mess around with it. I was surprised to note that
apparently even 110 and 126 are still commercially available - these
aren't so easy to DIY because of the registration holes.
.
- References:
- Wet photography is really dying
- From: David Nebenzahl
- Re: Wet photography is really dying
- From: Ken Nadvornick
- Re: Wet photography is really dying
- From: David Nebenzahl
- Re: Wet photography is really dying
- From: Rob Morley
- Re: Wet photography is really dying
- From: Charles Hohenstein
- Wet photography is really dying
- Prev by Date: Re: Wet photography is really dying
- Next by Date: Re: Enlarger lens options.
- Previous by thread: Re: Wet photography is really dying
- Next by thread: Re: Wet photography is really dying
- Index(es):