Re: UC and Federal Law Violations


<bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1137289068.283724.34940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lawrence Akutagawa wrote:
>
>> Naw...if he is as he says he is, he certainly would have no qualms
>> whatever
>> to share his rec.photo.darkroom rants with his publisher as he has with
>> us.
>> hmmm...the use of the term "vendetta" suggest some negativity...I daresay
>> that UC finds nothing - absolutely nothing - negative, embarrassing, or
>> even
>> annoying in his comments in this newsgroup. He comes across as one of
>> the
>> fundamentalist Muslims does - he has seen the light and knows the truth.
>> Any and all who disagree with him (especially as regards to Rodinal) are
>> infidels and need to be treated as such. And so he does.....
>
> I think moving a Usenet dispute into the "real world" is usually
> a sign of defeat, or revenge-taking. UC is a pain in the ass.
> He clearly relishes that role. He likes the outraged reaction,
> so the agitated responses are playing his game. Speaking
> about Usenet flamebaiters in general, not just UC: If they offend
> you, the way to avoid giving them what they want is to either avoid
> responding, or at least avoid becoming irritated and retaliating.
> The posters whom I most enjoy reading on this NG rarely get
> agitated - for example Richard Knoppow. And after all, it's not
> like UC can stop you from using Rodinal.
>
> I don't see what it would serve to attempt to suppress UC's book,
> should it actually be on its way to publication.
>
Suppress? Who said anything about suppressing his book? The point is that
if UC is as he says he is, he should have no qualms sharing his
rec.photo.darkroom comments and deep knowledge with one and all, on the net
or off...including his publisher. In fact, I wait with bated breath to see
some of his rec.photo.darkroom comments on the dust cover of his book. Now
if he is hesitant to so share, then one would reasonably conclude that
perhaps - just perhaps - he is not as he says he is.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ADP opened read-only
    ... I do not know how to suppress that memmage, ... if you cannot avoid users opeing the same adp/ade file or user ...
    (microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver)
  • Is there a way to supress the authentication check when using SSH?
    ... I'm trying to automate some ssh connections to a number of ips that do ... To avoid this prompted, I'm forced to ... this prompt? ... the warning msgs that this can suppress. ...
    (comp.security.ssh)