Re: B&W negatives
- From: tls@xxxxxxxxx (Thor Lancelot Simon)
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:36:37 +0000 (UTC)
In article <c95cu2-o1h.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rod Smith <rodsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Are you saying both sides of the film looked glossy? If so, that's a bit
>odd
Not for Tmax 100 *** film, it's not. It's coated on both sides for
easy retouching, if I recall correctly, though I don't know if this is
true of the current "new" product.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky
.
- References:
- B&W negatives
- From: steve b via PhotoKB.com
- Re: B&W negatives
- From: Rod Smith
- B&W negatives
- Prev by Date: Re: strabonic exploit
- Next by Date: underexpose/overdevelop
- Previous by thread: Re: B&W negatives
- Next by thread: Re: B&W negatives
- Index(es):