Re: strabonic exploit
- From: David Nebenzahl <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:12:17 -0700
On 8/27/2005 3:05 PM Lloyd Erlick spake thus:
http://albumen.stanford.edu/library/monographs/sunbeam/toc.html
Towler, John. The Silver Sunbeam. Joseph H. Ladd, New York: 1864. Electronic edition prepared from facsimile edition of Morgan and Morgan, Inc., Hastings-on-Hudson, New York. Second printing, Feb. 1974. ISBN 871000-005-9
a quote from:
Chapter XLI. STEREOSCOPICITY.
... Eyes may be tutored to see two photographs in relief by the following expedients, and without the aid of stereoscopes.
...The student ... has to learn to see double. This is effected by holding up the thumb before the eyes, so as to see two thumbs; when he is expert at this, let him next hold up in front of his eyes, at the regular reading distance, both his thumbs, and try if he can see four thumbs.
This struck me, as it pretty well describes my normal vision; I was born cross-eyed, had an operation at ~4 years which was supposed to correct this, but didn't, the result of which I have a permanent strabismus. (My eyes don't converge; my "bad" eye strays about 10-15° outward.) The upshot of which is I only look out of one eye. I can *see* out of both eyes, but I shut one of them off (basically, ignore it) internally; otherwise, I'd see double (which used to happen and gave me whanging headaches as a kid).
An interesting aspect of this is that I don't feel any deficit whatsoever in terms of depth perception. So apparently binocular vision isn't necessary for this. In fact, I'd say that stereoscopic vision (in humans, anyhow) is highly overrated. (Since I still see out of the "other" eye, it probably contributes something to my overall perception, and were I to lose the eye, it might affect depth perception. Also, I can't "get" those kewl images-hidden-in-random-patterns pictures.)
I may be taking a job with a one-eyed employer; perhaps if circumstances are right I might get a chance to ask him about his sense of depth.
-- - The French Revolutionary Calendar (in use 1793-1806):
* Vendémiaire (from Latin vindemia, "vintage") Starting Sept 22, 23 or 24 * Brumaire (from French brume, "mist") Starting Oct 22, 23 or 24 * Frimaire (From French frimas, "frost") Starting Nov 21, 22 or 23 * Nivôse (from Latin nivosus, "snowy") Starting Dec 21, 22 or 23 * Pluviôse (from Latin pluviosus, "rainy") Starting Jan 20, 21 or 22 * Ventôse (from Latin ventosus, "windy") Starting Feb 19, 20 or 21 * Germinal (from Latin germen, "seed") Starting Mar 20 or 21 * Floréal (from Latin flor, "flower") Starting Apr 20 or 21 * Prairial (from French prairie, "meadow") Starting May 20 or 21 * Messidor (from Latin messis, "harvest") Starting Jun 19 or 20 * Thermidor (from Greek thermos, "hot") Starting Jul 19 or 20 * Fructidor (from Latin fructus, "fruits") Starting Aug 18 or 19
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: strabonic exploit
- From: Lawrence Allan Kriese
- Re: strabonic exploit
- Prev by Date: Re: B&W negatives
- Next by Date: Re: B&W negatives
- Previous by thread: B&W negatives
- Next by thread: Re: strabonic exploit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|