Re: Seizures in Dogs


"Nick" <the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gk5b0h$o8n$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul E. Schoen wrote:


"Nick" <the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gk3af5$u1j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Your favorite source to cite:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Pidgin

it has nothing to do with a lack of spelling ability, and everything to
do with using a time specific 'Internet Phenomena'(source specific
term)
as a response on the... Internet. Gasp!

I was responding in kind with my own lolspeak, but my point, which
apparently flew right over your head, was the lack of the word "not".

There is no lack of the word 'not'. Apparently you aren't fully aware
of all of the common sentence structures used in Kitty Pidgin. I'll
break it down for you...

You state the person's shortcoming followed by "your doing it wrong"...

No "not" involved.

Here I quote from Shelly in her post:

Matt says, "Because seizures are the only thing to consider
when choosing a dogfood."

Shelly says, "I think the fourth word is supposed to be "not."

She may not be the most brilliant bulb in the chandelier, but she was able
to see that, while you apparently are fixated on your attempt at sarcasm
and humor to the point where you totally miss the point. No use pursuing
this any further with someone who approaches the point of maximum density.


Spending more money to avoid other potential risk factors that you
personally ignore is logical. My point remains you look at only two
variables, Rosemary and cost and try to prove your method is better.
That is where you logic is lacking.
------------------^ (you missed something here!)

I'm not saying it isn't adequate for your dog, but your dog would be
better off on a better food. But even that point is debatable, because
your dog's activity level is also a variable in the equation of which
food is better for YOUR dog. A higher activity level would mean you
would actually need to do things with your dog, so in your case that is
a negative.

So, your argument proves my point!

Everything must be judged in terms of context. What is better for you and
your dog is not necessarily better for me and Muttley. That's the point I
was trying to make. But it just does not register with one who is incapable
of reading for content, or expressing ideas properly.

Paul and Muttley


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Angus ducks the questions
    ... You own a dog, so you are now confessing that your dog will "disturb and ... "sock-puppet", on the internet and, as that term has no meaning other ... "Simple hand puppets are usually not much larger than the hand itself. ... Internet posting to Malcolm Kane of Penrith from Dr Malcolm A Ogilvie ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • RE: Search Companion
    ... and it is the "Little Dog" one but when I ... I get useless "DRSN" search. ... When on the internet the Search is intended more ... and click Search up on the Toolbar, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize)
  • Re: Under appreciated writers
    ... In the Year of the Dog, the Great and Powerful Sea Wasp declared: ... Beth Meecham said that she ... was more open to the Internet and alternate marketing. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Do you speak Fashion?
    ... out that it was a perfectly legitimate question, ... And I elaborated on the old quotation: "On the Internet nobody ... nobody knows you're a dog. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Muttley: Now a question of Life or Death
    ... Last Tuesday, toward the end of Janet's obedience class, Muttley and I had ... opportunity to attack a young black male Lab to my left, ... the end of the class, and the other dog, Bernie, was taken to an animal ... unpredictability and sudden aggression without warning are major concerns. ...
    (rec.pets.dogs.behavior)
Loading