Re: Hills tested ingredients
- From: Shelly <scouvrette@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 19:55:49 GMT
shore@xxxxxxxxx (Melinda Shore) wrote in news:f0dj0p$34k$1
@panix2.panix.com:
I think there are a couple of things: 1) I have no idea what
the price elasticity is in dog food ingredients but that's
going to be a factor, and 2) if you've got two things
selling for the same price and one of them is of higher
quality (for whatever value of "quality") there's a tendency
to favor that one, which gets back to the question of price
elasticity. Look at Walmart, which has the thinnest of
thinny-thin-thin margins but makes a fortune by selling in
huge volume.
Also, I'm pretty sure the thing about using melamine (or
whatever) to look like there's more protein than is really
there is still just a conjecture, in any event.
Yes, yes, yes, and yes. I just don't think that it does anyone any
favors to get hysterical (guilty!) or pissy. I'm trying my
damnedest to try and be as objective as I can about the whole mess,
and to be careful where I point fingers.
--
Shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net (the Mother Ship)
http://esther.cat-sidh.net (Letters to Esther)
The bored people are those who are consuming much and producing
nothing.
-- William Ralph Inge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hills tested ingredients
- From: buglady
- Re: Hills tested ingredients
- References:
- Hills tested ingredients
- From: Lynne
- Re: Hills tested ingredients
- From: buglady
- Re: Hills tested ingredients
- From: Shelly
- Re: Hills tested ingredients
- From: Melinda Shore
- Hills tested ingredients
- Prev by Date: Re: Hills tested ingredients
- Next by Date: Re: Hills tested ingredients
- Previous by thread: Re: Hills tested ingredients
- Next by thread: Re: Hills tested ingredients
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|