Re: Food
- From: "wolfpuppy" <togrul@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:42:43 -0500
"Melinda Shore" <shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:du9onb$3qt$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1141400441.308559.81010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
gaubster2@xxxxxxxxxxx <cgaub@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As long as
people out there are going to focus on ingredients over all else (even
nutrition), Hill's will try to actually EDUCATE people about NUTRITION.
Shouldn't they wait until they hire someone who knows about
it?
Just a suggestion.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - shore@xxxxxxxxx
Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community.
I wouldn't claim to be an expert on dog foods, per se, but I do believe,
when I have a question, in asking someone who I feel is qualified to answer
the question. When it came to dog food, I touched base with the breeder who
I bought my latest dog from, and my vet. My breeder uses IAMS exclusively,
and recommended that I do the same. Since I paid a great deal of money for
my pup, I took her at her word. When I questioned my vet on IAMS, he was
very quick to point out that it was a high quality dog food.
It isn't true in every case, but I feel that you most often get what you pay
for. Aside from that, I feel that if breeders of expensive dogs and vets
agree that IAMS is a quality dog food, I am ok using it. However, I am
always open to new information. If anyone has ever had a negative
experience with IAMS, I surely would want to hear about it.
Of course, my dogs would really rather have the fried chicken or steak that
I may be eating....naturally....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Food
- From: Melinda Shore
- Re: Food
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: getting Frontline Plus via the internet
- Next by Date: Re: Food
- Previous by thread: Re: Food
- Next by thread: Re: Food
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
