Re: Hairy dog
- From: TOTE@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Sep 2005 04:48:39 GMT
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Melanie L Chang <mlchang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> whittled these words:
> Stafford A. Rau (raudog@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> : Now that dog looks like it could have some beardie in it not too far back...
> Yup. And this dog, and Fly, and a number of other similar dogs, are all
> eligible for full AKC registration. I wonder if they realize that?
Of course they are. They aren't cloistered from the information so
readily available. The decision about what is or is not a breed is in
the end arbitrary. AKC is fully aware that breeding certain breeds can
technically produce a puppy of another "breed" e.g. the Belgian Shepherd.
In FCI it is one breed, four varieties.
http://www.thepetprofessor.com/breed_profiles/dogs/belgian_sheepdog.aspx
The decision about what is still the same breed is best applied without
hard and fast rules.
--
Diane Blackman
There is no moral victory in proclaiming to abhor violence
while preaching with violent words.
http://dog-play.com/ http://dogplayshops.com/
.
- References:
- Re: Hairy dog
- From: Stafford A. Rau
- Re: Hairy dog
- Prev by Date: Re: Hairy dog
- Previous by thread: Re: Hairy dog
- Next by thread: Re: Vizsla and cats? (Pat P)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
