Re: Tranquil dog
- From: "Many Dogs \(flick\)" <many_dogs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:32:57 -0600
"Greens" <prbj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NOGdnfZnktlDU9DanZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Put up a link to the specific story. It's important to include the date of
the incident.
I posted the links to all the stories I referenced.
Serious pit bull attacks are common.
Define "common." Then tell me how you're certain that the breed is
correctly identified in the news article. Third, explain why pit bull
bites/attacks shouldn't be fairly common *compared to other breeds* as there
are more registered pit bulls than any other breed in the U.S.
Judging by the stats of dog bite related deaths, I'd be most afraid to own
German Shepherds and Saint Bernards.
You're another one who has to resort to name calling when things aren't
going your way.
You demand links, which I already provided. You refused to read them.
Troll.
flick 100785
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- References:
- Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Michael A . Ball
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Michael A . Ball
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Many Dogs \(flick\)
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Many Dogs \(flick\)
- Re: Tranquil dog
- From: Greens
- Tranquil dog
- Prev by Date: Re: Tranquil dog
- Next by Date: Re: Tranquil dog
- Previous by thread: Re: Tranquil dog
- Next by thread: Re: Tranquil dog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|