Re: Agressive dog

On Sep 17, 12:24 pm, "Greens" <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Except that particular dog was not a known biter so your entire point
is moot. You can't take a bite incident after the fact and tell them
it is their fault because they adopted a known biter when they picked
the dog based on it's apparent stable temperament. They attempted to
select a good dog that didn't have any problems, and since all
rottweilers do not bite people, you can't say that all rottweilers are
known biters. It's basic logic, which you apparently lack.

Nick

I've had a lot of experience with strange dogs and i can tell you rotties
are scary dogs that seem to be on the edge. Dogs express themselves pretty
well with body language. It doesn't take super powers to figure out who's
aggressive and who isn't and rotties are aggressive. They also are known to
have a powerful bite. I've heard it said they have the most powerful bite of
all dogs.

And all the Rottweilers you have met means two things in regards to
the breed, jack and ***, and jack just left town. I myself have met
several Rottweilers, and I don't feel they were particularly
aggressive. These included Rottweilers in rescue that were dragged
through *** up to that point. My point remains that either of us
sees such a small subset that our opposing views on the breed do not
matter. However, no statistics exist, even on your pro breed ban
sources, that show any breed is aggressive all of the time as you try
and make them out. You tell people it is there fault for adopting
known biters because they are of a certain breed. That is pure and
utter horse ***. No dog is a known biter prior to any incident
regardless of the dogs breed.

<snip a whole lot of *** from fear mongering pro breed ban people
that don't actually know the breeds in question>


Maybe you should read about pit bulls at sites that aren't run by pit bull
worshippers. Of course all you'll do is scan those articles for "lies" and
"inaccuracies".

Maybe you should spend a little time actually considering the
potential for inaccuracies. I do it on both pro and anti breed ban
websites, and I find the sites which are for a breed ban tend to use a
lot more innaccurate information than those that are against, although
neither side is blameless on that issue.

Nick


.

Quantcast