Re: Agressive dog
- From: "the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx" <the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:01:12 -0000
On Sep 14, 9:20 pm, "Greens" <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<the.longest.username.availa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189802795.041310.181630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 14, 3:54 pm, sh...@xxxxxxxxx (Melinda Shore) wrote:
In article <1189799415.657985.30...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
the.longest.username.availa...@xxxxxxxxx
<the.longest.username.availa...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And this dog wasn't a threat in the first place,
just because it was a Rottweiler, it doesn't make it a threat.
Nick, the dog bit a neighbor.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - sh...@xxxxxxxxx
Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community
My point is the dog was not a threat initially, which Greens appears
to be telling them it's their own fault for adopting a known biter.
Nick
You're right. I'm saying that they shouldn't have got that breed of dog.
They're just asking for it by getting that breed. You have interpreted what
I said accurately.
Except that particular dog was not a known biter so your entire point
is moot. You can't take a bite incident after the fact and tell them
it is their fault because they adopted a known biter when they picked
the dog based on it's apparent stable temperament. They attempted to
select a good dog that didn't have any problems, and since all
rottweilers do not bite people, you can't say that all rottweilers are
known biters. It's basic logic, which you apparently lack.
Nick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Agressive dog
- References:
- Agressive dog
- From: peterharris_uk
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: Handsome Jack Morrison
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: Greens
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: Melinda Shore
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: the.longest.username.available@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Agressive dog
- From: Greens
- Agressive dog
- Prev by Date: Re: Soda, defintely OT
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Bar Mitzvah
- Previous by thread: Re: Agressive dog
- Next by thread: Re: Agressive dog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|